[Mb-civic] Democrats Struggle To Seize Opportunity - Washington Post

[William Swiggard]

Democrats Struggle To Seize Opportunity
Amid GOP Troubles, No Unified Message

By Shailagh Murray and Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 7, 2006; A01

News about GOP political corruption, inept hurricane response and chaos 
in Iraq has lifted Democrats' hopes of winning control of Congress this 
fall. But seizing the opportunity has not been easy, as they found when 
they tried to unveil an agenda of their own.

Democratic leaders had set a goal of issuing their legislative manifesto 
by November 2005 to give voters a full year to digest their proposals. 
But some Democrats protested that the release date was too early, so 
they put it off until January. The new date slipped twice again, and now 
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) says the document will be 
unveiled in "a matter of weeks."

Some Democrats fear that the hesitant handling is symbolic of larger 
problems facing the party in trying to seize control of the House and 
Senate after more than a decade of almost unbroken minority status. 
Lawmakers and strategists have complained about erratic or uncertain 
leadership and repeated delays in resolving important issues.

The conflict goes well beyond Capitol Hill. The failure of congressional 
leaders to deliver a clear message has left some Democratic governors 
deeply frustrated and at odds with Washington Democrats over strategy.

Party leaders, for example, have yet to decide whether Democrats should 
focus on a sharply negative campaign against President Bush and the 
Republicans, by jumping on debacles such as the administration's 
handling of the Dubai port deal -- or stress their own priorities and 
values.

There is no agreement on whether to try to nationalize the congressional 
campaign with a blueprint or "contract" with voters, as the Republicans 
did successfully in 1994, or to keep the races more local in tone. And 
the party is still divided over the war in Iraq: Some Democrats, 
including Pelosi, call for a phased withdrawal; many others back a 
longer-term military and economic commitment.

"It could be a great year for Democrats," said Rep. Jim Cooper 
(D-Tenn.), but the party must present a more moderate face and 
distinguish itself more clearly from the GOP on issues such as ethics. 
"The comment I hear is 'I'd really like to vote for you guys, but I 
can't stand the folks I see on TV,' " Cooper said in a telephone 
interview from Nashville.

On issues such as explaining that former lobbyist Jack Abramoff's work 
"was a 110 percent Republican operation," Cooper said, "we're not making 
nearly as much headway as we should." Abramoff has pleaded guilty in a 
corruption scandal.

The Democratic leaders in Congress -- Pelosi and Sen. Harry M. Reid 
(Nev.) -- are the party's chief strategists and architects of the 
agenda, which they view as a way to market party ideas on energy, health 
care, education and other issues. They have held countless meetings to 
construct the right list, consulting with governors, mayors and just 
about every Democratic adviser in town.

"By the time the election rolls around, people are going to know where 
Democrats stand," Reid said.

But many in the party have their doubts. On Feb. 27, Reid and Pelosi 
appeared before the Democratic Governors Association. At one point in 
the conversation, Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, noting that the two leaders had 
talked about a variety of themes and ideas, asked for help. Could they 
reduce the message to just two or three core ideas that governors could 
echo in the states?

According to multiple accounts from those in the room, Reid said they 
had narrowed the list to six and proceeded to talk about them. Pelosi 
then offered her six -- not all the same as Reid's. Oregon Gov. Ted 
Kulongoski said later: "One of the other governors said 'What do you 
think?' and I said 'You know what I think? I don't think we have a 
message.' "

Others, including Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) and Rep. Rahm Emanuel 
(Ill.) -- who head the Senate and House campaign efforts -- believe the 
November election will turn mainly on how voters view Republicans. 
Schumer is leading the Democratic attack on the port deal, excoriating 
the administration for jeopardizing national security -- a realm in 
which Republicans have held the advantage with voters.

He and Emanuel have sought to delay the agenda's release to allow 
Democratic attacks to hold the stage with minimum distraction. "When 
you're in the opposition, you both propose and oppose," Emanuel said. 
"But fundamentally, this is going to be a referendum on [Republican] 
stewardship."

Also dividing Democratic strategists is the question of what lessons to 
take from the Republican landslide of 1994, when the GOP won the Senate 
and picked up 54 House seats, wiping out 40 years of Democratic rule. 
Some Democrats associate that breakthrough with the House Republicans' 
"Contract With America," a list of proposals on policy and government.

"We should take a page from their book" and have "an overarching theme" 
similar to the 1994 contract, said Sen. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.).

Many of his colleagues agree, but not Reid. "We're not going to do a 
'Contract With America,' " Reid said in an interview. He noted that the 
GOP document received scant attention when it was presented a few weeks 
before the 1994 election, and political historians say it played a minor 
role in the outcome. "There's a great mythology about the contract," 
Reid said.

Even the party's five-word 2006 motto has preoccupied congressional 
Democrats for months. "We had meetings where senators offered 
suggestions," Reid said. "We had focus groups. We worked hard on that. . 
. . It's a long, slow, arduous process."

That slogan -- "Together, America Can Do Better" -- was revived from the 
2004 presidential campaign of Sen. John F. Kerry. It was the last line 
of Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's response to President Bush's State 
of the Union address, and Reid, Pelosi and Democratic National Committee 
Chairman Howard Dean have used it in speeches. But there is an effort 
afoot to drop the word "together." It tests well in focus groups and 
audiences, Democratic sources said, but it makes the syntax incorrect.

Governors privately scoff at the slogan. They also say the message 
coming from congressional leaders has been too relentlessly negative. 
"They want to coordinate. They want to collaborate. That's all good," 
said one Democratic governor who declined to be identified in order to 
talk candidly about a closed-door meeting. "The question is: Coordinate 
or collaborate on what? People need to know not just what we're against 
but what we're for. That's the kind of message the governors are 
interested in developing at the national level."

Reid spokesman Jim Manley said congressional Democrats have spent the 
past year redefining the debates over terrorism and Iraq and have 
prepared the ground for a shift to a more positive message that will 
focus on energy, health care and homeland security, all areas in which 
the governors would concur, he predicted. "We've had an unprecedented 
level of cooperation," he said.

Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly added: "At the end of the day, I think 
everyone will be on board."

Perhaps the Democrats' greatest dilemma is how to respond to the Iraq 
war. It looms as the biggest question mark over Bush's administration 
and the Republican lawmakers who have backed him on the conflict almost 
without question.

Congressional Democrats have been split over the war since 2002, when 
many voted to authorize military action. The ground shifted last 
November when Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), a leading Democratic voice on 
military matters, called for U.S. troops to be withdrawn as soon as 
possible. Two weeks later, Pelosi endorsed his stance.

Although Pelosi said she was not speaking for her caucus, some 
colleagues complained that she was handing Republicans a gift by 
enabling them to tag Democrats as soft on terrorism and forcing 
Democratic candidates to explain whether they agreed with their House 
leader.

There is little question that the political landscape looks promising 
for Democrats. A Feb. 9 poll by the Pew Research Center found that 
Democrats lead Republicans 50 to 41 percent in a generic ballot.

But congressional Democrats have some key deficiencies. For instance, 
they lack the hard-charging, charismatic figurehead that Gingrich 
represented for the House GOP in 1994. But the Democrats have an 
abundance of presidential hopefuls, and their agendas sometimes differ 
from those of Reid, Schumer, Pelosi and Emanuel.

For instance, Sen. Russell Feingold (Wis.) tried to filibuster the 
renewal of the USA Patriot Act, a move opposed by most of his Senate 
colleagues, including Reid. Kerry (Mass.) led an unsuccessful filibuster 
attempt against Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s confirmation as a Supreme Court 
justice. The best-known Democrat is Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), 
whose plans for a 2008 presidential bid leave many of her colleagues 
wary of how her famous but divisive presence might affect them.

"There are lots of skeptics," Schumer conceded. But the polls look 
better and better, he stressed. "There may be some inside-the-Beltway 
babble, but it's not affecting the voters," said Schumer, who wants the 
agenda delayed again -- until summer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/01/AR2006030102193.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060307/d679710a/attachment.htm