[Mb-civic] The Man Who Wasn't There on 9/11 - Washington Post
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Sat Mar 4 05:48:27 PST 2006
The Man Who Wasn't There on 9/11
Next Week, U.S. Will Begin Its Case for Moussaoui's Death
By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 4, 2006; A01
Zacarias Moussaoui was sitting in jail when the hijacked planes crashed
into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and in a field in
Pennsylvania. Now, the government wants him executed for that day of
terror because he did nothing to stop it.
After the jury is selected Monday, prosecutors will argue that even
though Moussaoui wasn't there, he should be held accountable for the
murders of nearly 3,000 people on Sept. 11, 2001. Their task, on its
face, is formidable: Federal law says people can be executed only for
killing someone or participating in a violent act that directly caused a
death.
Yet legal experts say prosecutors stand a reasonable chance of securing
a death sentence for the only person convicted in the United States on
charges stemming from Sept. 11. The reason: Moussaoui's own words. When
he pleaded guilty, he acknowledged that he had lied to the FBI when he
was arrested a month before Sept. 11 "to allow his al-Qaeda brothers to
go forward."
Relying on that admission, prosecutors will argue that Moussaoui might
as well have pulled the trigger -- because if he had confessed his
knowledge of the plot, the hijackings could have been stopped. "I think
they have a good case, given his own statements," said Andrew McBride, a
former federal prosecutor who has tried numerous death penalty cases.
"He admits that he lied to further the conspiracy. Legally, that
probably makes it."
Moussaoui, 37, pleaded guilty in April to charges that include
conspiracy to commit aircraft piracy. He has become the poster boy for
the deadliest terrorist strike in U.S. history, yet his precise role
remains unknown, even to the government. If he had not been arrested,
investigators have theorized, he could have been anything from the "20th
hijacker" to a last-minute replacement to the pilot of a fifth plane
intended to strike the White House.
Whatever Moussaoui's intentions were, the trial in U.S. District Court
in Alexandria promises to combine weighty matters of national security
with elements of the absurd. The trial is expected to last one to three
months.
The anonymous 18-member jury, including six alternates, will watch the
Justice Department lay out for the first time in a public courtroom its
view of how the Sept. 11 attacks were planned and executed. A death
sentence would do much to support the Bush administration's strategy of
keeping the case in the criminal justice system -- instead of before a
military court -- to show that the system can handle complex terrorism
matters and punish the guilty.
Alexandria Location
The administration is also relying on jurors to validate its decision to
try the case in Alexandria instead of New York, where most major
terrorism cases had been prosecuted. Officials have said they felt the
Northern Virginia jury pool is more conservative and pro-government. Yet
they are fighting the weight of history: No Alexandria federal jury has
ever returned a death sentence.
Defense attorneys will try to exploit that by probing the sensitive
underside of the government's failure to stop the attacks. They will
argue that U.S. officials knew far more about al-Qaeda's plans than
Moussaoui did, according to court documents. Even if Moussaoui had told
all he knew, the defense says, the government's own failures show that
agents would not have acted properly on the information.
A hint of the high-level nature of the evidence emerged last week when
the defense battled to secure the testimony of Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.),
who is trying to persuade a judge to quash a subpoena.
Weldon has alleged at congressional hearings that a secret Pentagon
program, known as Able Danger, identified lead hijacker Mohamed Atta
more than a year before Sept. 11. "This information is plainly helpful
to the defense as it showed that the government possessed specific
information about the presence of the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks
in the United States before Sept. 11," defense attorneys wrote in a
court filing.
Defense lawyers are also fighting a highly unusual opponent: their own
client.
In what legal observers call a first for the U.S. justice system,
Moussaoui -- an avowed al-Qaeda member who swore a blood oath to Osama
bin Laden -- is being given a public forum. He has said he plans to
testify, and sources familiar with the case say his attorneys have no
idea what he might say.
The French citizen has already shown he will make the most of the
opportunity. He was repeatedly ejected from the courtroom by U.S.
District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema during jury selection for erupting at
his attorneys, the judge and prosecutors. Even when he was allowed back
in, he muttered blessings for bin Laden and curses for America after the
judge had left.
His behavior will be witnessed by family members of Sept. 11 victims,
who are gathering to watch the trial at remote viewing locations at five
federal courthouses across the country. If jurors decide that Moussaoui
is eligible for the death penalty, a second phase of the trial will
feature highly emotional testimony from family members and people
injured on Sept. 11.
If Moussaoui's own words could hurt him before the jury, they may have
already helped prosecutors make their case. Prosecutors will argue,
court documents say, that Moussaoui should die because he allowed the
plot to proceed by lying to the FBI and that his deception was a direct
cause of the deaths.
When Moussaoui was arrested in Minnesota a month before Sept. 11, he
told federal agents that he was training as a pilot for personal
enjoyment and that after finishing, he intended to visit New York and
Washington as a tourist.
When he pleaded guilty, Moussaoui signed a statement of facts admitting
that he had lied to the FBI to allow al-Qaeda "to go forward with the
operation to fly planes into American buildings." Prosecutors pointed to
this admission in proposed jury instructions they submitted to the judge
last week.
Stephen A. Saltzburg, a George Washington University law professor, said
the government should be able to prove much of its case. "There is no
doubt they can prove that he joined the conspiracy . . . and that he
didn't do anything to stop
9/11," Saltsburg said.
Prosecution's Task
The harder part, Saltzburg said, is showing that Moussaoui's lies
directly contributed to the murders. In the end, he said, it may depend
on how Brinkema instructs the jury on the law. "How is he responsible
for Sept. 11 and the deaths on Sept. 11?" Saltzburg said. "It's that
last step, the last link."
Prosecutors declined to comment but have indicated in court documents
that they do not feel they need to prove that Moussaoui had a specific
task on Sept. 11.
"I think no one will ever know," McBride said. "The only people who have
an idea are Osama bin Laden and some of his lieutenants."
Moussaoui's intentions have been mysterious ever since his name first
emerged in press reports -- he was called Habib Zacarias Moussaoui then
-- a few days after Sept. 11.
He was born in the Basque region of France, to a Moroccan father and a
French mother, according to interviews and court documents. His father
was an abusive alcoholic, and Moussaoui spent his first five years in
and out of orphanages, according to court records filed by the defense.
Although Moussaoui grew up only nominally practicing Islam, he moved to
London as a young man to master English and became exposed to "the
radical mosques which flourished in London in the 1990s," the court
papers said.
Hooking up with bin Laden's organization, Moussaoui trained at an
al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan and managed an al-Qaeda guesthouse in
Kandahar, he acknowledged in the court document he signed. He entered
the United States in 2001 and began taking flying lessons at Airman
Flight School in Norman, Okla.
As Sept. 11 approached, Moussaoui took a series of actions that closely
mirrored those of the hijackers. He bought two knives and made sure
their blades were short enough to get through airport security,
according to court documents and the independent commission that
investigated the 9/11 attacks. In August 2001, he received nearly
$15,000 from al-Qaeda and began training on a 747 simulator at a flight
school in Minnesota.
The 9/11 commission later concluded that Moussaoui was most likely being
primed as a Sept. 11 replacement pilot and that the hijackers probably
would have postponed their strike if his arrest had been announced.
Moussaoui's conduct raised suspicions at the flight school because he
wanted to fly large jets when he had little training. He did not want a
pilot's license. His instructor reported him to the authorities, and
Moussaoui was arrested on immigration charges Aug. 16, 2001.
Moussaoui's actions were considered suspicious enough that the
then-director of the CIA, George J. Tenet, was briefed, but a series of
government missteps, chronicled at length by the 9/11 commission,
prevented investigators from piecing together Moussaoui's intentions --
or the Sept. 11 plot.
After Sept. 11, Moussaoui emerged as a key suspect. Some government
officials, including Vice President Cheney, suggested that he might have
been the 20th hijacker, referring to the fact that the plane that
crashed in a field in Pennsylvania had only four hijackers aboard. The
other three planes had five hijackers each.
Moussaoui signed his plea agreement as the "20th hijacker," though he
often called himself that in handwritten motions filed from jail,
usually in a mocking tone.
But prosecutors have vehemently pointed out that they never called
Moussaoui the 20th hijacker in any court proceeding, even as he has
become known as that to many people. "Instead, the '20th hijacker'
theory appears to be a creation of the media coverage and the isolated
statements of certain government officials in the immediate aftermath of
the Sept. 11 attacks," prosecutors wrote in an appellate court brief
filed in 2003.
Although the government has never spelled out his role, a federal grand
jury in Alexandria indicted Moussaoui in December 2001 on conspiracy
charges.
In July 2002, Moussaoui interrupted a routine court hearing and tried to
plead guilty, claiming an intimate knowledge of the hijackings.
"I have certain knowledge about September 11," Moussaoui said, according
to a transcript. "I know exactly who done it. I know which group, who
participated, when it was decided. I have many information."
After Brinkema gave him a week to think about it, Moussaoui withdrew his
plea and claimed that although he is an al-Qaeda member, he had no
advance knowledge of the hijackings.
A constitutional showdown over Moussaoui's access to top al-Qaeda
detainees, who Moussaoui's attorneys said had information that could
clear him, then delayed the case for more than two years. Eventually, a
federal appeals court ruled that Moussaoui could not interview the
detainees but could present to the jury portions of statements they made
to interrogators.
Last April 22, Moussaoui pleaded guilty to six conspiracy counts. Yet
the day's proceedings only added to the uncertainty.
The court document Moussaoui signed said that he had participated in the
al-Qaeda plot that culminated in Sept. 11 and that bin Laden had
personally instructed him to fly an airplane into the White House. But
when Moussaoui stepped to the lectern, he denied any role in Sept. 11
and said the White House attack would be an attempt to free Sheik Omar
Abdel Rahman, who is imprisoned for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
"This conspiracy was a different conspiracy than 9/11," Moussaoui said.
As he was led from the courtroom by security officers, he shouted:
"Lord! God curse America!"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/03/AR2006030301751.html?nav=hcmodule
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060304/cedbe29b/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list