[Mb-civic] Always Having to Say He's Sorry By BOB HERBERT

[Michael Butler]

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

March 2, 2006
Op-Ed Columnist
Always Having to Say He's Sorry
By BOB HERBERT

If there were a trapdoor that was somehow rigged to open beneath the U.S.
senators we really don't need, Conrad Burns of Montana would surely fall
right through it.

Mr. Burns is a racially insensitive Republican whose re-election bid this
year has been jeopardized by his dealings with the G.O.P. superlobbyist Jack
Abramoff. Mr. Abramoff has pleaded guilty to charges of fraud, tax evasion
and conspiracy to bribe public officials. Among other things, he's admitted
to bilking American Indians out of millions of dollars, and he's said to be
singing louder than the fat lady to federal investigators.

Mr. Burns is reported to have received more money in the form of campaign
contributions from Mr. Abramoff and his favor-strewing friends than any
other member of Congress. This has delighted his political opponents, who
have tried to show that Mr. Burns and Mr. Abramoff were as close as a pair
of prisoners sharing a single set of handcuffs.

When The Times asked whether he or members of his staff might get caught up
in the federal investigation, Mr. Burns said he didn't know. As he put it,
"You can't say yes and you can't say no."

The Abramoff scandal is just the latest issue to raise questions about
Senator Burns's fitness to hold high public office. You've heard of
accidents waiting to happen? He's an accident that happens again and again
and again.

Back in 1994, while campaigning for a second term, Senator Burns dropped by
a local newspaper, The Bozeman Daily Chronicle, and told an editor an
anecdote about one of his constituents, a rancher who wanted to know what
life was like in Washington.

Mr. Burns said the rancher asked him, "Conrad, how can you live back there
with all those niggers?"

Senator Burns said he told the rancher it was "a hell of a challenge."

The anecdote was published, and Senator Burns apologized. When he was asked
why he hadn't expressed any disapproval when the rancher used the word
nigger, the senator said: "I don't know. I never gave it much thought."

Maybe he didn't express any disapproval because he didn't particularly
disapprove. On another occasion Senator Burns had to apologize after giving
a speech in Billings about America's dependence on foreign sources of oil.
In the speech, he referred to Arabs as "ragheads."

"I regret the use of such an inappropriate term," he said. "I hope I did not
overshadow the serious substance of my remarks."

Mr. Burns's apologies have always been undermined by the serial nature of
his offensive remarks. Last fall he upset a pair of female flight attendants
after one of them, a mother with two children, asked him about outsourcing
and the economy. She wondered what she would do if she lost her job. The
senator reportedly replied that she could stay home and take care of her
children.

A third flight attendant, after hearing the story, wrote an angry letter to
Mr. Burns, saying, "Before you sit in judgment and make such ignorant
statements, you really should stop and remember that we don't all live in a
'Leave It to Beaver' world."

It has always been this way with Conrad Burns. Back in 1991, immediately
after a civil rights bill had been passed, he invited a group of lobbyists,
some of them white and some of them black, to accompany him to an auction.

When asked what was being auctioned, he replied, "Slaves."

The Washington Post quoted one of the lobbyists as saying: "We were floored.
We couldn't believe it." Senator Burns later said he was talking about a
charitable auction in which the services of individuals are sold.

When you consider that clowns like Conrad Burns can inhabit some of the
highest offices in the land, it's no longer such a mystery why the United
States of America seems to be barreling down the wrong track at truly
hair-raising speeds.

As we've found with the war in Iraq and so many other important issues,
leadership matters. And serious leaders in the U.S. have been in dangerously
short supply.

In response to questions about the Abramoff scandal, Mr. Burns has denied
that he's done anything wrong. And he dismisses concerns about the amount of
money he received. "What's the difference between one dollar and one
thousand?" he said. "It's all dollars. Just like you rob a bank down here.
If you get a thousand you go to jail, and if you get a million you go to
jail."

    * Copyright 2006The New York Times Company
    * Home
    * Privacy Policy
    * Search
    * Corrections
    * XML
    * Help
    * Contact Us
    * Work for Us
    * Site Map
    * Back to Top