[Mb-civic] Mb-civic Digest, Who's Afraid of a Gas Tax?
EAN at sbcglobal.net
EAN at sbcglobal.net
Wed Mar 1 14:20:46 PST 2006
Friedman says some VERY good stuff for a
change....except that utter bunk about lumping
Venezuela and Chavez--where democracy is flourishing
and where oil money is used to help the poor--in with
Saudi Arabia! What a dolt!
--Mha Atma
The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
March 1, 2006
Op-Ed Columnist
Who's Afraid of a Gas Tax?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
My gut told me this was the case, but it's great to
see it confirmed by the
latest New York Times/CBS News poll: Americans not
only know that our oil
addiction is really bad for us, but they would be
willing to accept a
gasoline tax if some leader would just frame the
stakes for the country the
right way.
I am sure one reason President Bush suddenly chose to
build his State of the
Union address around ending our oil addiction and
moving toward a
renewable-energy future was because his private
polling told him the same
thing. But Mr. Bush simply occupied this ground
rhetorically ? before
Democrats could get there ? without actually offering
a real solution.
The only real solution is raising our gasoline tax,
which is a paltry 18.4
cents a gallon and has not been increased since 1993.
Only if the total
price of gasoline is brought into the $3.50-to-$4-per-
gallon range ? and
kept there ? will large numbers of Americans demand
plug-in hybrid cars that
run on biofuels like ethanol. When large numbers of
Americans do that, U.S.
automakers will move quickly down the innovation
curve.
"Impossible," campaign consultants say. "A gasoline
tax is political
suicide." No, it all depends on how you frame it.
The poll reported yesterday found that 60 percent of
those polled, including
one-third of Republicans, disapproved of how Mr. Bush
is handling our energy
crisis. Only 27 percent approved. Most want real
action ? now. In the poll,
87 percent said Washington should require car
manufacturers to produce more
efficient cars.
Of course, when asked simply whether they'd favor a
gasoline tax, 85 percent
said no and only 12 percent said yes. But when the
gas tax was framed as
part of a national strategy to achieve energy
security and climate security,
pollsters got a very different answer. When the tax
was presented as
reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil, 55 percent
favored it and 37
percent said no. And when asked about a gas tax that
would help reduce
global warming, even more respondents supported it ?
with 59 percent in
favor and 34 percent opposed.
And that is without a single Democrat or Republican
leading on this issue!
Imagine if someone actually led?
Many Americans now understand: the Energy Question is
the big strategic
issue of our time, overtaking 9/11 and the war on
terrorism. If a leader
from either party would correctly frame the issue ?
that a gas tax is the
single most important geostrategic move we could make
today ? a solid
majority would support it.
Taking on this issue is the only hope the Bush team
has for producing a
legacy out of its remaining years. And it is the
Democrats' only hope for
taking on the Republicans with a big idea ? rather
than relying on G.O.P.
scandals to win.
Sadly, both sides fear the other will smear them if
they run on this issue.
O.K., say you're running for Congress and you propose
a gas tax, but your
opponent denounces you as a wimpy, tree-hugging
girlie-man, a
tax-and-spender. What do you say back?
I'd say: "Oh, really? I guess you think it is smart,
tough and patriotic for
us to be financing both sides in the war on
terrorism ? the U.S. military
with our tax dollars, and Al Qaeda, Iran and various
hostile Islamist
charities with our energy purchases.
"Now how patriotic is that? I guess you haven't
noticed that today's global
economic playing field has been leveled and that
three billion new players
from India, China and Russia have walked onto the
field, buying new cars,
homes and refrigerators. So if we don't break our
addiction to crude oil,
we're going to heat up this planet so much faster ?
enough to melt the North
Pole and make Katrina look like a summer breeze.
"Now how smart is that? I guess you don't realize
that because of this
climate change and the rising cost of crude, green
technologies are going to
be the industry of the 21st century, and a gasoline
tax is the surest way to
make certain that our industries innovate faster and
dominate innovation in
green cars, homes and appliances.
"Finally, I guess you haven't noticed that the wave
of democratization that
seemed unstoppable after the fall of the Berlin Wall
has run into a black
counterwave of petro-authoritarianism. This black
wave of oil-financed
autocrats ? Venezuela, Russia, Iran, Nigeria, Burma,
Saudi Arabia ? has all
the money in the world now to turn back the
democratic tide. And you think
doing nothing to reverse that is patriotic? Shame on
you, you unpatriotic
wimp. Green is the new red, white and blue, pal. What
color are you?"
That's what I'd say.
Maureen Dowd is on a book tour.
* Copyright 2006The New York Times Company
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list