[Mb-civic] Hammering Away - George F. Will = Washington Post Op-Ed
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Thu Jan 26 03:03:45 PST 2006
Hammering Away
Tom DeLay Is Direct, Uncomplicated -- and Unrepentant
By George F. Will
Thursday, January 26, 2006; A25
RICHMOND, Tex. -- Out here, where the tendrils of Houston's growing
exurbs reach for open ground, sits Rio Bend, a cluster of new houses and
other facilities for parents having difficult times with troubled foster
children -- difficulties like those Tom and Christine DeLay experienced
with several teenagers they took into their home. Rio Bend was built by
the DeLays, with help from friends, of sorts.
She, an acerbic realist from south Texas, says more houses are planned
by their charitable organization, but: "I hated to lose the leadership
position because it helps me to raise money for those kids." Note her
agreeably guileless acknowledgment that some friends of Rio Bend may not
have been seized by simple altruism. She shares her husband's credo --
power is useful and should be used -- and knows the moral ambiguities it
can involve.
He strides like a bantam rooster into the living room of one of the Rio
Bend bungalows, having just been buoyed by an appreciative luncheon of
400 Realtors to whom he read a list of earmarks -- personally directed
spending, aka pork -- he has delivered to his district. Most people,
battered as he recently has been, would be curled up on the carpet in a
fetal position. But DeLay is as direct and uncomplicated as the tool
that supplies his nickname -- "The Hammer" -- and his faults do not
include being a whiner.
Furthermore, he is not about to plea-bargain in the court of public
opinion. He chafes under prudential reticence: His attorneys tell him
not to trumpet the fact that the Justice Department told them he is not
a target in the Jack Abramoff investigation. But about other matters,
the bantam is belligerent.
Earmarks? Although recently "they got out of hand," they are, he says,
necessary and proper because it is best to have spending dictated by a
politician who knows his district's needs: "We are an equal branch of
government -- why should we let a bureaucrat decide?" He says that in a
state such as Illinois, which is dominated by Democrats "who play
hardball," earmarks are the only way even House Speaker Dennis Hastert
can get highway money spent in his district.
The K Street Project? That is, getting interest groups to hire
Republican lobbyists, and to make such hirings fruitful by transactions
using, among other things, earmarks? The author of this insists: "I'm
very proud of it." In 1994 "we were coming as a Republican majority into
a Democratic culture" in Washington. For 40 years, he says, the media
had hired people congenial to sources who controlled Congress. And K
Street -- the lobbyists' habitat -- hired Democrats to ensure access to
Democrats. K Street Republicans "never got to see John Dingell or [Dan]
Rostenkowski," two Democratic chairmen of crucial committees.
So, DeLay asks: In 1995, what do you think Democratic-dominated K Street
was interested in? "Helping us get our work done? Secure our majority?"
Those are rhetorical questions.
DeLay's Democratic opponent this fall will be Nick Lampson, a former
congressman who in 2004 lost his seat in another district, partly
because of the redistricting DeLay engineered that resulted in five
additional Republican seats. DeLay won in 2004 with only 55 percent of
the vote, partly because he thought that "to set an example" he should
consent to making his district more Democratic in order to make others
less so.
Referring to his trial on campaign finance charges brought by a
notoriously political Democratic prosecutor, DeLay says, with a
confidence that might be misplaced but clearly is unfeigned, "I'll be
acquitted by the end of April." Then he says he will secure a 12th term,
winning "the most expensive congressional race ever ." The national
Democratic Party and several liberal groups -- already running ads and
phone banks -- spend, well, liberally.
Because undecided voters are thin here -- he estimates they are about 13
percent of the district -- this election will be about mobilizing the
faithful. So the piling on by his critics -- their wretched excesses in
response to what they perceive to be his -- may help him.
Congress under Republican control has increased earmarks 873 percent in
a decade and validated the axiom that the more solicitous government
becomes, the more servile it seems and the more scorn it receives.
Congress has not been so unpopular since 1994, when Democrats lost their
40-year grip on the House. But here on the east bend of the Brazos
River, unlike on the Potomac, the fever for reform is not high. To a
visiting columnist who waxes censorious about earmarks for highway
projects, DeLay responds with a notable lack of repentance: "You just
drove out on one."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/25/AR2006012501780.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060126/ddda01e8/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list