[Mb-civic] 'Blue' States Tackling Energy On Their Own - Washington
Post
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Sun Jan 22 02:46:28 PST 2006
'Blue' States Tackling Energy On Their Own
Federal Efficiency Rules Fall Short, Some Say
By Justin Blum
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 22, 2006; A01
Democratic-leaning states increasingly are regulating energy use and
emissions, working around a GOP-controlled federal government that state
officials say has not done enough.
The states are creating energy efficiency requirements for light bulbs
and household appliances, limiting power plant and automobile output
linked to global warming, and requiring the use of renewable energy,
such as wind and solar.
Leading the effort are "blue" states that voted Democratic in the 2004
presidential election. Even some of those states that have Republican
governors, such as California and Connecticut, are making their own rules.
"In a way, the left is controlling that agenda," said Amy Myers Jaffe,
associate director of the energy program at Rice University in Houston.
"They're just implementing it at the community and state level."
Jaffe and other analysts said some of the policies would have to be
adopted nationally to have a significant impact on the environment and
energy consumption. But with other policies, such as the auto emissions
limits, they said a sufficient number of big states are adopting
regulations to make a significant difference nationally. "If all these
giant-population states do this, does it matter that we don't have a
national policy?" Jaffe asked.
Seven states that voted Democratic in 2004's presidential election have
signed on to a regional plan to restrict power plant emissions. Eleven
states that went Democratic have adopted, or are in the process of
adopting, automobile tailpipe emissions requirements, which face a court
challenge before they can be implemented. Nine of the 10 states that
have adopted appliance efficiency regulations also voted Democratic.
Requirements that a portion of electricity come from renewable sources
have caught on beyond the Democratic-leaning states. Seven states that
went Republican in 2004 have joined 13 Democratic-leaning states and the
District of Columbia in setting those rules.
Though the new regulations are not necessarily partisan, the activists
behind them say their adoption requires lawmakers and constituents who
are concerned about global warming and energy-conservation -- issues
that Democrats often emphasize.
The Bush administration welcomes state efforts "as long as they do not
put Americans out of jobs or move emissions from one state to another or
one country to another," said Michele St. Martin, a spokeswoman for the
White House Council on Environmental Quality.
State officials say their constituents are demanding new limits on
pollution and energy consumption. "What is frustrating is that these
things aren't being done on a national basis," said Maine Gov. John E.
Baldacci (D).
In some cases, states complain that the federal government has failed to
take steps required by law.
The Energy Department has not decided if it should implement some new
rules for appliance energy efficiency or update some old ones, for
example, even though legal deadlines have passed for numerous
appliances, such as home furnaces and boilers. The department says it is
working on improving its performance.
Some Republican lawmakers in Washington defended their record on energy
matters, noting that they approved an energy bill last year designed to
increase energy supplies and promote cleaner energy sources. Lawmakers
said they support allowing states to chart their own course, though they
may disagree with some of the measures.
"Unless we get involved in a situation . . . where we make it almost
impossible for there to be an automobile market in the United States, I
don't see anything wrong with the states being involved," said Sen. Pete
V. Domenici (R-N.M.), chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources
Committee.
States are having an impact in a number of ways.
Aggressive action at the state level has forced manufacturers to agree
to some national efficiency requirements for appliances. After several
states moved to regulate ceiling fans, for instance, manufacturers
agreed to national standards to avoid the expense and hassle of
customizing products for individual states.
But there are still a number of state appliance restrictions for which
there are no federal rules, creating costly complications for
manufacturers. The 10 states that have passed their own energy
efficiency standards do not always agree on which appliances should be
covered or what the standards should be.
California is the only state with separate standards for hot tubs and
pool pumps. Only Massachusetts has rules for residential furnaces,
boilers and the fans inside. California has standards for televisions,
DVD players and recorders, and New York has taken initial steps toward
making its own rules for the same products.
The state-by-state standards are "absolutely a nightmare for our
members," said Keith McCoy, the National Association of Manufacturers'
vice president of resources and environmental policy in Washington.
"They create a patchwork of regulatory compliance issues."
Industry has supported some state measures that require energy
generation by renewable sources. Even politically conservative states
such as Texas have signed on, at least partially because supporters
think the new rules could have a positive impact on the environment
without creating a negative one on the economy.
With the regional power plant emissions plan, seven Northeastern states
have agreed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Environmentalists had
lobbied heavily for the measure as a way to limit the release of gasses
linked to global warming.
The electric industry opposes the power plant restrictions, saying the
result could be a loss of manufacturing jobs to countries where the cost
of producing electricity is lower. The industry argues that states
acting alone cannot have a significant impact on worldwide greenhouse
gas emissions.
"There's not really anything that can be done locally or at a state
level or local level to put a significant dent in greenhouse gasses,"
said Bill Fang, the climate issue director for the Edison Electric
Institute, an industry group in Washington.
Another group of states has targeted automobiles, a major source of
greenhouse gas emissions. The rules limiting the amount of carbon
dioxide and other gasses that can come out of tailpipes would go beyond
federal regulations already in place.
Automakers, which are suing to have the rules overturned, say the
restrictions would push up prices and reduce sales.
But local officials -- tired of waiting on the federal government to
beef up its own pollution-control rules -- say they have acted prudently
in attempting to take charge of what comes out of the tailpipes and
smokestacks in their states.
"The federal standards are simply not good enough," said Gina McCarthy,
commissioner of Connecticut's Department of Environmental Protection.
"If we can't get the federal government to act, then we have to take
action in any way we can."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/21/AR2006012101067.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060122/a11b65df/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list