[Mb-civic] Senate Democrats Emphasizing Ethics,
Not Alito - Washington Post
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Mon Jan 16 04:27:20 PST 2006
Senate Democrats Emphasizing Ethics, Not Alito
Unable to Keep Conservatives Off Court, Leaders Turn to Issues That Have
More Traction With Voters
By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 16, 2006; A02
Just as Samuel A. Alito Jr. was wrapping up three days of testimony in
his bid for a Supreme Court seat -- which core Democratic groups
desperately want to prevent -- the Senate's Democratic leader sent an
e-mail statement to hundreds of journalists.
In it, Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) had this to say about Alito:
not one word. The Thursday news release, trumpeting a "Republican
Culture of Corruption" in big red letters, dealt with Republican
lawmakers' alleged ties to disgraced former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, a
theme of Democratic messages these days.
Later that day, after Alito had left the hearing room, Reid issued a
criticism of the nominee but made no mention of a possible filibuster,
seen as the only conceivable way Democrats might thwart the nomination
in the GOP-controlled Senate.
The fact that Reid paid scant attention to Alito that day, amid heavy TV
coverage, is testament to the faith that Democratic leaders place in the
ethics-corruption issue as a winner in November's congressional elections.
On Wednesday -- when Senate Democrats return from recess and huddle on
the Alito nomination for the first time since the hearing --
congressional, national and state party leaders plan a major Washington
event. It will not focus not on Alito but on a proposed "honest
leadership act" that would ban gifts to lawmakers, among other things.
These priorities hint at the difficulties Democrats have experienced
during the past six months in pursuing the goal of keeping conservatives
such as Alito and John G. Roberts Jr. off the Supreme Court. Roberts
coasted to confirmation as chief justice last fall, and GOP senators
predict Alito will be confirmed this month, albeit by a narrower margin.
Analysts say Alito's confirmation in particular could move the court
notably to the right.
The Supreme Court battles stand in contrast to last year's major
Democratic victory, the stifling of President Bush's bid to restructure
Social Security. Although key constituency groups poured money and time
into both efforts, the outcomes differed dramatically.
"The reality is that Social Security hits people where they live," said
Democratic pollster Geoff Garin. "Nearly everyone feels they have skin
in the game. It is harder to grab the public's attention on a court
nomination."
Senate Democrats have learned this lesson the hard way. Now, forced to
decide soon whether to launch an Alito filibuster that is likely to
fail, several are asking whether it is worth the effort, party insiders
say. One top Senate Democratic aide, who spoke on background because he
did not have his boss's permission to talk publicly, predicted a closed
debate Wednesday on whether it makes more sense to focus on the most
promising issues, such as GOP ethics woes, and avoid being tarred as
"obstructionists" for trying to derail a confirmation vote.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she will vote against Alito's
confirmation but saw no reason to filibuster it. "I do not see the
likelihood of a filibuster," she said yesterday on CBS's "Face the
Nation." "I don't see those kinds of egregious things emerging that
would justify a filibuster."
Richard J. Durbin (Ill.), the second-ranking Democratic senator and one
of Alito's sharpest questioners last week, spoke to the party's mixed
feelings about a filibuster when he told reporters: "I'm not going to
presume one way or the other whether my colleagues are even interested
in it."
Such comments dismay liberal groups, including those backing abortion
rights. Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said Friday
she is not giving up on a filibuster. But she acknowledged that
Democratic senators need to be convinced. "Now it's our job to have the
American public talk to those senators," Keenan said as her group and
others unveiled a TV ad attacking Alito.
Meantime, Reid, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other
party leaders are focusing on congressional ethics and allegations of
GOP corruption. They hope Americans can relate to the issue viscerally,
as they did last year to Democratic pleas to "protect Social Security"
from Bush's proposed private accounts.
To that end, Democrats will argue that ethically dubious practices in
Congress hit Americans in the pocketbook. Republican lawmakers pass
bills that give tax breaks to oil companies, and forbid the federal
government to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for Medicare,
because they are beholden to petroleum and pharmaceutical lobbyists,
said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), his party's chief recruiter for
House candidates this fall.
Whether voters buy that message or not, they are likely to hear much
more about ethics than justices in the coming weeks and months.
"Regardless what the senators do," Van Hollen said, "there's going to be
a continuing focus on the lobbying and ethics scandals."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/15/AR2006011500704.html?referrer=email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060116/204da1d3/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list