[Mb-civic] Bush to Give Up $6,
000 In Abramoff Contributions - Washington Post
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Thu Jan 5 03:58:15 PST 2006
Bush to Give Up $6,000 In Abramoff Contributions
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 5, 2006; A01
Republican Party officials said yesterday that President Bush will give
up $6,000 in campaign contributions connected to disgraced lobbyist Jack
Abramoff, joining an expansive list of politicians who have shed more
than half a million dollars in tainted campaign cash.
The announcement came as Abramoff pleaded guilty in a second criminal
case, acknowledging that he conspired to defraud lenders in the purchase
of a fleet of Florida casino boats five years ago. The court appearance
in Miami came a day after Abramoff pleaded guilty before a federal judge
in Washington to defrauding Indian tribe clients of millions of dollars,
conspiring to bribe members of Congress and evading taxes.
Under plea agreements negotiated in the two federal cases, the
once-powerful lobbyist promised to provide evidence and testimony in a
wide-ranging Justice Department investigation of the lobbying of
Congress and of federal agencies.
Fearful of the adverse political fallout from the expanding corruption
investigation, Republicans in both houses of Congress moved forward with
face-saving legislation to tighten lobbying regulations and to
discourage dealings between lawmakers and influence-peddlers.
Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) called again for a limit on "pork-barrel"
projects in annual spending bills, which Abramoff himself has called
"favor factories."
And the conservative National Review -- a staunch defender of Rep. Tom
DeLay (R-Tex.) in his fight against campaign finance charges in his home
state -- urged the lawmaker to give up his bid to return to the GOP
leadership, citing his close connections to Abramoff.
Republican leaders in Washington hope the legislative moves and campaign
refunds will insulate their party as Abramoff begins cooperating with
one of the largest congressional corruption investigations in decades.
"The problem is that power corrupts, and we simply have too much of it,"
Flake said.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said that Bush does not know
Abramoff personally, although the two may have met at holiday receptions.
Abramoff raised more than $100,000 for the Bush-Cheney reelection
campaign, making him an honorary Bush "Pioneer." But the campaign is
giving up only $6,000, which came directly from Abramoff, his wife and
one of the Indian tribes the lobbyist represented. The money will be
donated to the American Heart Association.
The gesture was criticized by the watchdog group Public Citizen, which
called for an accounting of all the money that Abramoff had raised for
the campaign.
"President Bush needs to . . . reveal just how much money Abramoff
raised for him and who that money came from," said Frank Clemente,
director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch.
But McClellan contested any suggestion that Abramoff's fundraising had
won him any special favors or access.
"If someone thinks that money is coming in with strings attached, it
doesn't get in the door," he said.
At least 24 politicians have now pledged to relinquish $515,199 in
Abramoff-tainted campaign cash, including some of the most powerful
Republicans in Washington. House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) will
give up at least $60,000. DeLay, the former House majority leader, has
pledged to donate $57,000 in Abramoff-linked contributions to charity.
And acting House Majority Leader Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) plans to shed the
$8,500 that Abramoff and his wife donated to his political action committee.
"Because the donor of these funds has admitted to activities which are
illegal and which we deplore as detrimental to our form of government,
the executive director of the Rely on Your Beliefs will recommend that
the board donate these funds to a charity," said Blunt spokeswoman
Burson Taylor.
All but three of the 24 politicians giving up the funds are Republicans.
The three Democrats -- Sens. Max Baucus (Mont.), Richard J. Durbin
(Ill.) and Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.) -- have pledged to shed a total of
$97,000 in contributions. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry
M. Reid (D-Nev.) said Reid has no intention of shedding the $47,000 he
has received from Abramoff's lobbying team and tribal clients.
"Abramoff was a Republican operative, and this is a Republican scandal,"
said Reid spokesman Jim Manley. "Any effort by Republicans to drag
Democrats into this is doomed to failure."
The half-million dollars in pledged donations and refunds make up a
fraction of the $5.3 million that Abramoff, some of his lobbying
colleagues and tribal clients showered on 364 federal candidates and
campaign committees from 1999 to 2004. About 64 percent of that money
went to Republicans, about 35 percent went to Democrats, and 1 percent
went to candidates not affiliated with either party.
But it is not clear that simply shedding Abramoff's cash will get
lawmakers out of the lobbyists' shadow. According to Abramoff's guilty
plea, the contributions were aimed at winning specific favors, such as
torpedoing legislation or securing federal contracts.
"You just can't give the money back and forget about what the money was
for," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee.
With that in mind, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) asked
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) just before Thanksgiving to draft a package
of lobbying restrictions, according to Robert L. Traynham II, a Santorum
spokesman. That effort will run parallel to a push from Sen. John McCain
(R-Ariz.), who has drafted his own lobbying legislation. McCain's
partner in an earlier campaign finance effort, Sen. Russell Feingold
(D-Wis.), also has a proposal.
"I will be working with colleagues this session to examine and act on
any necessary changes to improve transparency and accountability for our
body when it comes to lobbying," Frist said in a statement yesterday.
"Some members have already made recommendations to me, or introduced
legislation. I look forward to working to secure the continued integrity
of the Senate."
In the House, a group of rank-and-file members approached Rep. Mike
Rogers (R-Mich.) last year to press him on the dangers that Abramoff
presented. Out of those meetings, Rogers, a former FBI agent who had
focused on public corruption in Chicago, began work on a House lobbying
measure, according to a Rogers aide.
The aide would offer no details, but he said the proposal is likely to
tighten the rules on the public disclosure of lobbying contacts and to
lengthen the time former lawmakers and aides must wait before they can
pursue careers as lobbyists.
Rogers's efforts are seen by GOP leadership sources as more palatable
than the separate packages that have been drafted by Rep. Christopher
Shays (R-Conn.) and a group of Democrats. Shays has been outspoken in
his condemnation of lobbying in the House, and of the Republican
leadership's refusal to permanently replace DeLay, who stepped down as
majority leader in September after he was indicted on charges of
campaign finance violations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010402111.html?referrer=email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060105/ea7bea76/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list