[Mb-civic] U.S. curbs soldiers' blogs -- Newsday.com

William Swiggard swiggard at comcast.net
Wed Jan 4 18:45:42 PST 2006


  U.S. curbs soldiers' blogs

BY JOSEPH MALLIA
NEWSDAY STAFF WRITER

Letters home filled with tales of death and danger, bravery and boredom 
are a wartime certainty.

And now, as hundreds of soldiers overseas have started keeping Internet 
journals about the heat, the homesickness, the bloodshed, word speeds 
from the battlefront faster than ever.

More and more, though, U.S. military commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan 
are clamping down on these military Web logs, known as milblogs.

After all, digital photos of blown-up tanks and gritty comments on urban 
warfare don't just interest mom and dad.

The enemy, too, has a laptop and satellite link.

Nowadays, milbloggers "get shut down almost as fast as they're set up," 
said New York Army National Guard Spc. Jason Christopher Hartley, 31, of 
upstate New Paltz, who believes something is lost as the grunt's-eye 
take on Tikrit or Kabul is silenced or sanitized.

Hartley last January was among the first active-duty combat troops 
demoted and fined for security violations on his blog, 
justanothersoldier.com.

Throughout last year, the Army, Marines, Air Force and Navy tightened 
control on bloggers by requiring them to register through the chain of 
command and by creating special security squads to monitor milblogs.

"The ones that stay up are completely patriotic and innocuous, and 
they're fine if you want to read the flag-waving and how everything's 
peachy keen in Iraq," said Hartley, who is back in New Paltz after two 
years stationed in Iraq.

The new emphasis on security, however, is welcome to some.

"When you put your blog out there, you cannot forget that not only the 
good guys, but the bad guys are accessing it, especially for TTPs," said 
Marine Capt. Don Caetano, of Mineola, referring to techniques, tactics 
and procedures. Now a recruiter in Garden City, Caetano was stationed in 
Fallujah, where he ran the embedded journalist program.

"The limitations on blogging basically mean, 'Don't make it easy for 
them. Don't readily give up information,' " that would endanger U.S. 
troops, Caetano said.

Revealing a minor aspect of strategy or tactics may seem insignificant, 
Caetano said, but, "If the bad guys take a piece from me, and a piece 
from you, and a piece from another guy, pretty soon they can gather some 
pretty good intel."

The military, at first unaware of the milblogging trend, last year began 
targeting bloggers with warnings, punctuated by high-profile 
disciplinary action.

The Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, in August sent a 
videotaped admonition to overseas troops warning them of the dangers of 
carelessness on blogs.

And, echoing the World War II censorship slogan, "Loose lips sink 
ships," the Pentagon in November sent out an advisory titled "Loose 
blogs may blow up BCTs." A BCT is a brigade combat team.

Hartley was fined $1,000 and demoted from sergeant. Others also have 
been disciplined, including Pfc. Leonard Clark, an Arizona national 
guardsman serving in Iraq who was demoted from specialist and fined 
$1,640 in August for putting classified information on his blog.

'That's sorta the point'

Among security breaches in postings on soldiers' Web sites, the Army 
pointed to photos of an Abrams tank pierced by a rocket-propelled 
grenade, which could show Iraqi insurgents where to aim.

In Hartley's case, the Army said he should not have described his unit's 
flight route into Iraq because that could help the enemy shoot down U.S. 
aircraft. And, the Army said, Hartley should not have disclosed that the 
last three bullets he loaded into his weapon's magazine were always 
tracers, because that could tip an enemy to time an attack just as an 
American soldier is reloading.

Despite those charges, Hartley asserts he did not put any American 
troops at risk. He believes the Army's real concern was his satiric tone.

"Photos of the week of cute Iraqi kids who I want to shoot," he 
captioned one set of snapshots on his blog in 2004.

"Something I cannot reiterate often enough is how monumentally 
misbehaved Iraqi street kids are," Hartley's blog continued. "But some 
of them are just so darn cute, you can't help but want to squeeze their 
little faces -- until they suffocate."

The Army took him literally, even though Hartley said he was aiming his 
satire at those who believe Iraqi civilians' lives have little value.

Some of Hartley's readers got the point. Others did not.

One of Hartley's Web entries on April 24, 2004, carried a photograph of 
an Iraqi man's partially burned corpse clothed in a bloodied white 
tunic. Hartley's photo caption was a take on the "I New York City" 
slogan. His version: "I Dead Civilians."

In response, a visitor wrote: "Is this a joke or what? This whole blogg 
gives a bad taste in the mouth."

Hartley replied, "It leaves a bad taste in your mouth? That's sorta the 
point."

Another blog reader, with the moniker Alberto, defended the shock-blog: 
"The point of being so graphic it's to see what a war really is. Good 
blog, keep it up!"

In general, observers say, soldiers' online musings are less and less 
compelling.

There's less of the informal, often coarse language -- one soldier 
speaking to another -- that gave a feeling of authenticity and attracted 
thousands of readers both in and out of the military, said Jon Peede, 
director of Operation Homecoming, a National Endowment for the Arts 
program that gives writing instruction to U.S. troops and is creating a 
collection of their blogs, letters and essays.

Yet one drawback to vivid, uncensored descriptions of combat on blogs 
was that the family of a wounded or killed soldier might get the news 
impersonally, or worry unnecessarily, Peede said.

"A blogger might say, 'We were in a firefight in a particular city, and 
a fellow Marine was wounded,' " Peede said, "and then 50 families might 
read that and think it's their son or brother."

Content concerns

Besides, wayward milblogs give the world a skewed view of U.S. troops, 
said Capt. Dan Rice, of Manhattan, who served in Tikrit for 18 months 
with the U.S. Army National Guard's 42nd Infantry Division. A West Point 
graduate, Rice served as a finance officer and is now back working as a 
vice president at the U.S. Trust Co. of New York.

Most bloggers are atypical soldiers, said Rice, who wrote a pro-military 
blog favored by his superior officers. "It will mostly be the 
risk-takers, the mavericks, and the one percent that's bitter, who will 
blog."

Readers also have taken up the debate.

"my only concern is the posting of troopers pics and info ... the 
jihadist moniter these blogs too," a visitor to adayiniraq.com wrote.

"these troops may have been compromised by these blogs," the visitor 
wrote. "i for one would rather have no blogs about our troopers if it 
needlessly endanger's 1 of thier lives."

Marine Cpl. Al Maldonado, 28, of West Hempstead, who saw combat in Iraq, 
said milblogs help maintain a connection between the troops and their 
friends, family and community back home. During weeks of supplying tons 
of ammunition to Marines in Fallujah in November, his family was cheered 
to find a humorous photo of him on a blog, Maldonado said.

Blogs also allow soldiers to simply describe their combat experiences, 
without feeling they are bragging, Maldonado said.

"Sometimes they want to tell everyone what they went through because 
they're afraid that when they go back, they won't be appreciated for 
what they've done," he said.

Maldonado, an ammo chief, criticized Hartley for blogging about the 
reloading technique. "To describe your method for loading tracers in a 
blog, that's pretty stupid. Now I know when three tracers go by me 
that's when he's reloading," he said.

A waste of time?

Seymour Hersh, the reporter who broke stories on the My Lai Massacre 
during the Vietnam War and torture at Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, 
said military commanders can't control the flow of information by 
shutting down soldiers' blogs.

"There's a tremendous communication underground. talk, they send 
e-mails, photos," Hersh said from his Washington, D.C., office. "The 
Army is wasting its time."

Milblogs remain popular. mudvillegazette.com claimed more than 700,000 
page views in 2005, with blackfive.net not far behind. And 
michaelyon.blogspot is ranked in the top 100 (No. 81) of the 8 million 
blogs tracked by Technorati.com.

But with stricter controls now in place, the milblogosphere's 
freewheeling days likely are limited.

Some critics of the censorship say it could be harder for American 
soldiers to publicly raise questions about the U.S. invasion of Iraq, 
the success or failure of the war effort, and the "stop-loss" policy 
that forces soldiers to remain after enlistment contracts expire.

But a complete milblog blackout may never succeed.

"Is it over? No way, as long as there are soldiers and the Internet. 
People will always be starting blogs and get shut down, and then someone 
else starts one," Hartley said. "In my generation, or younger, 
everyone's all about spilling their guts on the Internet."

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/ny-liblog02,0,2935520.story
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060104/bf1de585/attachment.htm


More information about the Mb-civic mailing list