[Mb-civic] Playing Politics With Pipelines - Anne Applebaum -
Washington Post Op-Ed
William Swiggard
swiggard at comcast.net
Wed Jan 4 03:58:08 PST 2006
Playing Politics With Pipelines
By Anne Applebaum
Wednesday, January 4, 2006; A17
Most Russians celebrate the new year with a few firecrackers, a glass of
sweet champagne, perhaps vodka and pickled herring to keep the party
going. This year the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, celebrated by
switching off the flow of natural gas to Ukraine. As the inhabitants of
Moscow and Kiev were waking up Sunday morning, nursing their hangovers,
Russian state television was broadcasting live from a compressor station
near Kursk. The pipeline branch boss was shown barking into a telephone:
"Yes. Yes. And through the big pipes -- nothing. Fine. That's clear. Let
the operators work on it." As the cameras rolled, workers turned the big
metal wheels, scrutinized computer terminals and watched the gauges drop.
By the end of the day, the Ukrainian government had called the shut-off
"unacceptable." The Russian government had denounced the Ukrainians for
turning down a "super-beneficial" new gas contract, one that would
quadruple the price Ukraine now pays for natural gas. The U.S.
government had issued a statement expressing "regret." The European
Union had announced it would hold a meeting. And thus began 2006, the
year in which Russia will assume the presidency of the Group of Eight
for the first time, the year in which the Russians want "energy
security" to be the G-8's major theme.
In a way, it made sense. By no ordinary measure does Russia deserve to
belong to the G-8, a group meant to include only the leaders of the
world's richest democracies. In sheer size, Russia's economy lags behind
those of Holland, Mexico and Brazil, among others. In per capita income,
Russians lag behind Malta, Brunei, Chile and Uruguay. Even in
conventional military power, Russia, with its army still stuck deep in
the Chechen mud, is hardly the behemoth it used to be.
But in its ability to manipulate European supplies of natural gas,
Russia is once again emerging as a superpower. There are still
limitations: It is true that Ukraine was paying less than the world
price for its gas, and also true that Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs
were both profiting from that post-Soviet arrangement (which helps
explain why it existed so long). It is furthermore true that Ukraine,
through which Russian gas also flows to Western Europe, is not without
leverage. Indeed, on Monday, as gas flows into Austria, Italy, France,
Hungary, Poland and Slovakia dropped sharply, too, loud protests forced
the Russians to switch the gas back on.
Nevertheless, the theatricality of the shut-off -- those television
pictures of big men turning big wheels -- suggests that this was a
political decision. The facts suggest that, too. After all, the object
of the blackmail was Ukraine, a country that is striving to achieve
political independence from Russia -- not neighboring Belarus, a country
that remains subservient to Russia. It was also President Putin, not
Gazprom, the Russian gas monopoly, who publicly announced the decisions
this week.
More to the point, the decision fits neatly into a pattern. Last month,
when Gerhard Schroeder, the former German chancellor, accepted a seat on
the board of a consortium led by Gazprom, the Russian gas monopoly -- a
consortium that will build a Russian-German pipeline that Schroeder
approved during his final days in office -- we learned that Russian gas
money has already been used to garner political influence. This week's
events are further proof that the Russian government is willing to use
its gas pipelines for political purposes as well. Today, Ukraine -- next
year, why not Germany?
Europe can still avert future blackmail. European governments could
invest in alternative infrastructure, such as marine terminals for
receiving and storing liquefied natural gas -- more of which would make
gas easier to trade internationally -- or a pipeline from the Caspian
Sea, under the Black Sea and through Ukraine. Theoretically, the
Europeans could also fight back diplomatically, in concert with the
United States. Take that presidency of the G-8, for example: Is
everybody still absolutely sure that Russia should remain a G-8 member?
Is everybody absolutely positive that they want Putin to act as the G-8
president?
But before Western leaders can even contemplate asking such impolitic
questions, they'll have to recognize Putin's new year's celebration as
the warning signal it was. Manipulation of television stations,
harassment of human rights activists, imprisonment of the president's
political rivals -- none of that has so far excluded Russia from the
club of civilized nations. Like the war in Chechnya, Russia's bitter
dispute with Ukraine over gas prices was, until now, largely dismissed
as a regional spat. That has to change. Perhaps if the Russians want to
talk about "energy security" in 2006, we should take them up on it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/03/AR2006010301280.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060104/9e9ddafc/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list