[Mb-civic] Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship - Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign

[Alittlehawk at aol.com]

Subject: Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship - Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:47:34 +0000

Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
The Guardian - Comment
Friday, April 14, 2006
By Greg Palast

Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the gaggle of generals, safely
retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week, six of them have called 
for
the Secretary of Defense's resignation.

Well, according to my watch, they're about four years too late -- and they 
still
don't get it.

I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink that the bemedalled boys 
in
crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the rump, in public. But to me, 
it
just shows me that these boys still can't shoot straight.

It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up in front of the UN and
identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons labs, was it, General
Powell?

It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us our next warning from 
Saddam
could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?

It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared that Al Qaeda and Saddam
were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?

Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious arrogance, a duplicitous
chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and Tinker-Toy Napoleon -- but he 
didn't
appoint himself Secretary of Defense.

Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of Defense you didn't read in the
New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner, the man our president
placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion viceroy.

Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working under the mis taken 
notion
that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq, the President meant the
Iraqis could choose their own government. Misunderstanding the President's 
true
mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold elections within 90 days 
and
for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the cities to a desert base. "It's
their country," the General told me of the Iraqis. "And," he added, most
ominously, "their oil."

Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed Garner a 101-page plan for
Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons at the State Department, Treasury
and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e. the sale) of "all state
assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting industries." The General
knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where the Iraqi sun don't 
shine.
Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting of Iraqi tribal leaders to
plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their o wn multi-ethnic 
government --
and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were on talking terms -- knew 
he
could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a welcomed "liberation"
turned into a hated "occupation."

But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition government would mean the
death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets privatization grab.

On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the very night General Garner
arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington. It was Rumsfeld on the 
line.
He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack, Jack, you're fired."

Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of on-the-ground experience in Iraq,
with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director of Kissinger Associates.
Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and postponed elections for a
year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot pasha, selling off Iraq's
economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as Rumsfeld's neo-con clique had
desired.

Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the six generals' call for
Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.

For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't shoot straight. They're
wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've gunned down the puppet 
instead
of the puppeteers.

There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked General Garner from Baghdad
without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or breathes or spits in the 
Bush
Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of approval. And ultimately, it's
the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.

Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't give them enough troops 
--
was ultimately a decision of the cowboy from Crawford. (And by the way, the
problem was not that we lacked troops -- the problem was that we lacked moral
authority to occupy this nation. A million troops would not be enough -- the
insurgents would just have more targets.)

President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him today on the intercom 
with
Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up." And Cheney replies, "Hey,
just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until he's taken all their ammo."

When Bush and Cheney read about the call for Rumsfeld's resignation today, I 
can
just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission Accomplished."

Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about choosing a target: It's the
President, stupid.


**********
Read more about the untold story of General Garner and the secret war plans 
in
ARMED MADHOUSE, by Greg Palast, to be released June 6 (US) and July 6 (UK). 
View
Palast's interview with Garner for BBC Television at www.GregPalast.com
============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20060415/01d0b0a6/attachment.htm