[Mb-civic] Something happening here ...
Reeeees at aol.com
Reeeees at aol.com
Thu Nov 10 07:50:43 PST 2005
Thursday, November 10, 2005 | Los Angeles Times
Something happening here ...
By Mark Rudd
MARK RUDD, who led the student uprising at Columbia University in 1968 and
then became a member of the Weather Underground, teaches math at a community
college in New Mexico.
I JOINED THE anti-Vietnam War movement as an 18-year-old college student, a
freshman at Columbia University. It was the fall of 1965, just months after
the U.S. began sending ground combat troops to Southeast Asia.
The older members of the Columbia chapter of Students for a Democratic
Society explained to me that unlike World War II, Vietnam was an imperial war, a
war of occupation whose purpose was the repression of a national liberation
movement. We were a small group then, but over the next three years SDS became
a critical part of a larger antiwar coalition. Our anger mounted, our
protests grew and our ranks burgeoned. Unfortunately, we went many bridges too far
and got ensnared in the hallucination of revolution. By 1969, it became more
important in SDS to fight each other over who had the "correct revolutionary
line" than to fight against the war itself.
Early the next year, while the war was still raging, my own faction, the
Weathermen, made the stupid and ultimately disastrous decision to disband SDS
and opt instead for "armed struggle," our middle-class version of urban
guerrilla warfare. Predictably, we became isolated and irrelevant over the ensuing
years, even as the larger antiwar movement went on to achieve its goal: U.S.
withdrawal from Vietnam.
I often wonder what would have resulted over the long haul if SDS — which
represented the radical, anti-imperialist wing of the antiwar movement — had
not chosen to self-destruct in violence and fantasy but instead had kept
plugging away, encouraging more and more people to understand and oppose the
building of an American empire.
This question seems particularly relevant today, 40 years later, as a
reawakening antiwar movement prepares to confront many of the same issues. Who
benefits and who loses from an American empire? What are the moral and economic
and spiritual costs to Americans? Is a system of international law possible as
an alternative to endless use of American military power? Viewed against the
bleak future that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice are offering Americans and
the rest of the world, these questions begin to seem more practical than
What's hard to understand — given the revelations about the rush to war, the
use of torture and the loss of more than 2,000 soldiers — is why the antiwar
movement isn't further along than it is. Given that President Bush is now
talking about Iraq as only one skirmish in an unlimited struggle against a
global Islamic enemy, a struggle comparable to the titanic, 40-year Cold War
against communism, shouldn't a massive critique of the global war on terrorism
already be underway?
Yet the movement has remained small and politically isolated since the
original outpouring of opposition in the spring of 2003, during the run-up to the
war. In part, it was the victim of its own early success, the spontaneous
demonstrations involving millions of people in the streets here and around the
world trying to stop the war before it began. When this initial outburst
failed, many became demoralized and hopeless.
Then, in 2004, most of the pent-up antiwar energy flowed into John Kerry's
campaign, with little to show for it but further demoralization. The movement
caught a second wind with the energizing presence of Cindy Sheehan, but it
remains small compared with the outpouring against the Vietnam War.
Probably it's because there's no draft now. Clearly the fact that
middle-class boys across the country were receiving draft cards and lottery numbers
went a long way toward helping spur resistance to the Vietnam War. Nor is there
a countercultural movement today that questions authority like the one that
emerged in the 1960s and 1970s.
But building a movement can be done. To increase our ranks, we'll need to
break through the too-common belief that change is impossible.
We'll also need to take on the larger war. As the next battle heats up,
perhaps against Iran or Syria, the movement will have to ask the American people
to look honestly at who we are in the world. The antiwar movement will have
to engage in the most difficult dialogue of our lives with our neighbors.
Throughout American history, popular movements have made vast
transformations in the social and political geography of this country — the abolition
movement, the women's suffrage movement, the civil rights movement, the labor
movement, the gay movement.
My own contribution is to tell the story of how an antiwar movement
involving millions of people accomplished something unique in American history and
almost unique in the history of empires: We helped stop a war of aggression by
our own country. This was American democracy at its best. I lived through it,
I saw it with my own eyes.
If all of us "gray-hairs" were to tell our stories, we might be able to make
a contribution. At least we could help people find hope in this dark time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mb-civic