[Mb-civic] A Time of Doubt for Atheists

Tue Jul 19 23:14:06 PDT 2005

http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/dn/latimes.gif

Los Angeles Times

By Gina Piccalo Times Staff WriterMon Jul 18, 7:55 AM ET

It's been years, decades even, since the Almighty was so hot.

The evidence is everywhere. President Bush rallied the faithful to hold on
to the White House. A book by an Orange County preacher extolling God's
purpose in our lives stays a bestseller for more than two years. And
Hollywood, frequently seen as a den of iniquity, is courting a more
spiritual audience in movies and TV.

Faith is the new must-have, evident when a major leaguer points skyward
after his base hit, when a movie star credits the Big Guy for his Oscar,
when the Justice Department backs the display of the Ten Commandments at two
state capitols, and when it defends the Salvation Army's requirement that
employees embrace Jesus Christ.

So where does that leave the fraction of Americans who define themselves as
godless? Although the percentage of Americans who claim no religion is about
14%, less than a quarter of them identify themselves as atheists, according
to recent polls.

Some are using humor to cope, such as actress Julia Sweeney in her one-woman
play "Letting Go of God," which ran in Los Angeles for several months this
year. "It's really because I take you so seriously," she tells an imaginary
God, "that I can't believe in you."

Others see the future as a time when nonbelievers are outcasts and religion
dictates law, social protocol, even private life.

"The McCarthy era is the last time this climate existed," says Simi Valley
resident Stuart Bechman, co-president of Atheists United, a local affiliate
of Atheist Alliance International.

Although the comparison sounds melodramatic, atheist activists believe the
climate to be so perilous that they're considering something drastic: unity.

Atheists aren't by nature of one mind. There's a godless organization for
every wrinkle of nonbelief ‹ the prayer-never-hurt-anyone, live-and-let-live
atheists; the prove-the-God-fearing-world-wrong, keep-America-secular
atheists; and the contrarian
I-don't-believe-in-God-but-don't-call-me-an-atheist atheists.

Fear, however, is a great motivator, and politically active atheists know
that they need an advocate in government to be heard. Unfortunately, as one
activist noted, most politicians are as eager to align with the godless
ranks as they are to lobby for pedophiles. Hence the need for an image
makeover.

Keen to cast off stereotypes of immorality, atheists are stressing their
integrity, patriotism and respect for the faithful while staying true to
their age-old commitment to the separation of church and state. Some even
bristle at the terms "atheist" or "nonbeliever." Others have begun raising
funds, lobbying politicians and building online communities.

There have been larger-scale actions as well. The first godless march on
Washington drew thousands in fall 2002, and a few months later the Godless
Americans Political Action Committee was formed. This year, an Inauguration
Summit of 22 like-minded groups was held in Washington to stimulate
cooperation days before Bush's swearing in. And this Veterans Day, so-called
foxhole atheists (servicemen and women who are nonbelievers) will be honored
in the capital.

If all goes as planned, says Ellen Johnson, longtime president of American
Atheists, at least one presidential candidate will be courting their vote in
2008.

"We can't complain about what the religious do," she says. "All we have to
do is copy their strategy."

*

Best or Worst of Times?

Some among the nonbelievers say life is pretty good compared with decades
past when violence was a common threat and professed nonbelievers were
driven from their jobs and homes.

"I actually think it is getting better for atheists in the U.S., despite the
religiosity of the current administration," Las Vegas atheist Clark Adams
writes in an e-mail. "Many celebrities are on record as nonbelievers, and
it's not too uncommon to see an atheist positively portrayed on TV or in
movies."

 Others, though, label this argument "denial." They're quick to reference
the many atheists who so fear harassment that they join atheist groups
anonymously and others who are cast out of their families, refused positions
involving children or relieved of jobs because of their nonbelief.

 It's this group that pushes the separation of church and state, a debate
energized during the 1960s by legendary atheist activist Madalyn Murray
O'Hair, who proclaimed herself "the most hated woman in America."

 They reject the argument often cited by Christian activists that the
nation's government was founded by Christians. They argue that although some
of the authors of the Constitution may have been religious men, they
consistently maintained a clear boundary between their faith and their
government. They note that until the communist scare of the 1950s, "In God
we trust" wasn't the national motto, nor did it appear on paper currency,
and "under God" was absent from the Pledge of Allegiance.

 They point out that Bush ‹ who as Texas governor declared April 17, 2000,
Jesus Day ‹ has awarded religious "armies of compassion" and other
faith-based groups more than $3 billion in public funds since 2003. And they
feel the steel in remarks by former California Supreme Court Justice Janice
Rogers Brown, now on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia, who told Roman Catholic legal professionals in April that people
of faith were embroiled in a "war" with secular humanists.

 "I have been threatened with damnation so many times it's stupid," says
Dave Silverman of Piscataway, N.J., communications director of American
Atheists and founder of NoGodBlog.com. "The amount of intolerance in this
country is staggering."

 Atheists often keep quiet about their worldview. Some say that to volunteer
their atheism offends believers.

 "We have a social idea that it's rude," says Bobbie Kirkhart, Los
Angeles-based president of Atheist Alliance International.

 Others say it instantly taints society's perception of them.

 Silverman says his 8-year-old daughter, who he says is also an atheist, has
been taunted as a Satanist by some of her Christian playmates. Atheist
United's Bechman says he usually receives hate mail or prank calls after he
takes a stance on church-state issues. Los Angeles acting teacher and Thomas
Jefferson impersonator Dale Reynolds says he's sometimes consoled by
believers saddened by his lack of faith.

 "It is the kind of thing that if you bring it up, there are ramifications,"
Reynolds says.

 Still, there are those outspoken nonbelievers doing their best to influence
the masses.

 American Atheists' Johnson, whose national organization claims 2,200
members, is a regular on news talk shows. She is also executive director of
the Godless Americans PAC, and meets with politicians to build awareness and
support for church-state separation legislation. She helped organize the
2002 march on Washington and is organizing November's Atheists in Foxholes
parade and ceremony. Yet, she acknowledges, atheism is a hard sell.

 "The candidate is in an awkward position," she says. "They're wary to be
endorsed by an atheistŠ. We have to be able to deliver the votes to get them
into office. I can't do that yet."

 Mynga Futrell and Paul Geisert of Sacramento hope to change that with a new
name and an online community. They founded the Brights' Net
(the-brights.net) in 2003 to create a place for people who share "a
worldview free from supernatural and mystical elements." They chose the term
"brights" because, unlike "godless," "atheist" and "nonbeliever," it did not
define them in religious terms. By creating this label, Futrell and Geisert
hope to "level the playing field" and recast members of their community as
independent thinkers who celebrate knowledge without identifying themselves
as vociferous anti-theists.

 They want to build a large, influential community, similar to MoveOn.org,
to sway public opinion. So far, they say, there are Brights in more than 115
countries.

 "There's this tremendous feeling of being a second-class citizen when you
know you're patriotic and working for all kinds of good things for the
country, and yet you're ranked with the pedophiles," Futrell says. "You have
to have political influence in order to get cultural change of any kind."

 *

 Celebrity Heroes

 If the politicians don't come, it doesn't hurt a cause to have a celebrity.

 In 1999, then-Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura became a hero for the movement
when he refused to endorse the National Day of Prayer and told Playboy
magazine that organized religion was "a sham and a crutch for weak-minded
people who need strength in numbers."

 Actress-writer Sweeney emerged this year as a sort of amiable advocate for
nonbelief. "Letting Go of God," which played at a small Hollywood theater,
proved so popular that Sweeney is recording a CD of the performance, writing
a book based on it and has plans to release it as a film.

 Her show aims to entertain and disarm audiences as it traces Sweeney's path
away from Catholicism.

 In one scene, a Bible study class causes her to find the book outrageous
and disturbing. She asks herself, "Is this one big practical joke?" Her
skepticism isn't limited to one religion; after a journey to the Far East
and a run-in with Deepak Chopra, she chooses science over faith because "for
the first time, knowing too much didn't ruin it."

 Breaking the news to her devout Catholic parents, however, didn't go well.
Her father forbade her from attending his funeral. Her mother complained
that "at least being gay is socially acceptableŠ. Why can't you just say
you're still searching?"

 Sweeney didn't respond to interview requests, but on her blog at
juliasweeney.com, she described the fallout of the recent publicity.

 The mail was so voluminous and, she writes, "so outraged and so filled with
hate" that on June 13 she decided to stop blogging for a while and has
considered moving.

 "I think I tried really hard not to be hateful in my monologue," she
writes. "I tried to make a case for faith and show the struggle with
compassion to all sidesŠ. I think I have a lot in common with Christians Š
because I think it's majorly important if someone is religious or not. Only
I think it should be on the 'not' side."

 Copyright © 2005 Los Angeles Times