[Mb-civic] (no subject)
Hawaiipolo at cs.com
Hawaiipolo at cs.com
Wed Apr 20 16:13:14 PDT 2005
Why Numbers Matter
By Marla Ruzicka
AlterNet
Wednesday 20 April 2005
> Just before her death, Marla Ruzicka wrote about the importance of
> recording and publicly releasing Iraqi civilian casualty numbers.
Baghdad - The writer, a 28-year-old humanitarian aid worker from California,
was killed Saturday in Baghdad when a suicide bomber aiming for a convoy of
contractors pulled alongside her vehicle and detonated his explosives. Her
longtime driver and translator, Faiz Ali Salim, also died. She filed this piece
from Baghdad a week before her death.
In my two years in Iraq, the one question I am asked the most is: "How many
Iraqi civilians have been killed by American forces?" The American public has a
right to know how many Iraqis have lost their lives since the start of the
war and as hostilities continue.
In a news conference at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan in March 2002, Gen.
Tommy Franks said, "We don't do body counts." His words outraged the Arab world
and damaged the US claim that its forces go to great lengths to minimize
civilian casualties.
During the Iraq war, as US troops pushed toward Baghdad, counting civilian
casualties was not a priority for the military. However, since May 1, 2003, when
President Bush declared major combat operations over and the US military
moved into a phase referred to as "stability operations," most units began to keep
track of Iraqi civilians killed at checkpoints or during foot patrols by US
soldiers.
Here in Baghdad, a brigadier general commander explained to me that it is
standard operating procedure for US troops to file a spot report when they shoot
a non-combatant. It is in the military's interest to release these statistics.
Recently, I obtained statistics on civilian casualties from a high-ranking US
military official. The numbers were for Baghdad only, for a short period,
during a relatively quiet time. Other hot spots, such as the Ramadi and Mosul
areas, could prove worse. The statistics showed that 29 civilians were killed by
small-arms fire during firefights between US troops and insurgents between
Feb. 28 and April 5 - four times the number of Iraqi police killed in the same
period. It is not clear whether the bullets that killed these civilians were
fired by US troops or insurgents.
A good place to search for Iraqi civilian death counts is the Iraqi
Assistance Center in Baghdad and the General Information Centers set up by the US
military across Iraq. Iraqis who have been harmed by Americans have the right to
file claims for compensation at these locations, and some claims have been paid.
But others have been denied, even when the US forces were in the wrong.
The Marines have also been paying compensation in Fallujah and Najaf. These
data serve as a good barometer of the civilian costs of battle in both cities.
These statistics demonstrate that the US military can and does track civilian
casualties. Troops on the ground keep these records because they recognize
they have a responsibility to review each action taken and that it is in their
interest to minimize mistakes, especially since winning the hearts and minds of
Iraqis is a key component of their strategy. The military should also want to
release this information for the purposes of comparison with reports such as
the Lancet study published late last year. It suggested that since the US-led
invasion there had been 100,000 deaths in Iraq.
A further step should be taken. In my dealings with US military officials
here, they have shown regret and remorse for the deaths and injuries of
civilians. Systematically recording and publicly releasing civilian casualty numbers
would assist in helping the victims who survive to piece their lives back
together.
A number is important not only to quantify the cost of war, but as a reminder
of those whose dreams will never be realized in a free and democratic Iraq.
Marla Ruzicka was founder of Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict , or
CIVIC. In 2003, she organized surveyors across Iraq to document civilian
casualties. Before that, she managed a similar project in Afghanistan that helped to
secure assistance from the US government for civilian victims.
Go to Original
Aid Worker Uncovered America's Secret Tally of Iraqi Civilian Deaths
By Andrew Buncombe
The Indpendent UK
Wednesday 20 April 2005
A week before she was killed by a suicide bomber, humanitarian worker Marla
Ruzicka forced military commanders to admit they did keep records of Iraqi
civilians killed by US forces.
Tommy Franks, the former head of US Central Command, famously said the US
army "don't do body counts", despite a requirement to do so by the Geneva
Conventions.
But in an essay Ms Ruzicka wrote a week before her death on Saturday and
published yesterday, the 28-year-old revealed that a Brigadier General told her it
was "standard operating procedure" for US troops to file a report when they
shoot a non-combatant.
She obtained figures for the number of civilians killed in Baghdad between 28
February and 5 April, and discovered that 29 had been killed in firefights
involving US forces and insurgents. This was four times the number of Iraqi
police killed.
"These statistics demonstrate that the US military can and does track
civilian casualties," she wrote. "Troops on the ground keep these records because
they recognise they have a responsibility to review each action taken and that it
is in their interest to minimise mistakes, especially since winning the
hearts and minds of Iraqis is a key component of their strategy."
Sam Zia-Zarifi, deputy director of the Asia division of Human Rights Watch,
the group for which Ms Ruzicka wrote the report, said her discovery "was very
important because it allows the victims to start demanding compensation". He
added: "At a policy level they have never admitted they keep these figures."
Exactly how many Iraqi civilians have been killed in the last two years is
unclear. Iraq Body Count, a group that monitors casualty reports, says at least
17,384 have died. But the group bases its totals only on deaths reported by
the media, and says it can therefore only "be a sample" of the total actually
killed. Its website says: "It is likely that many if not most civilian
casualties will go unreported by the media. That is the sad nature of war."
A peer-reviewed report published last year in The Lancet and based on an
extrapolation of data suggested that 100,000 civilians may have been killed during
the invasion and its aftermath. One of the report's author, Dr Richard
Garfield, professor of nursing at Columbia University, said: "Of course they keep
records and of course they pretend they don't. Why is it important to keep the
numbers of those killed? Well, why was it important to record the names of
those people killed in the World Trade Centre? It would have been inconceivable
not to. These people have lives of value.
"We are still fighting [to record] the Armenian genocide. Until people have
names and are counted they don't exist in a policy sense."
Ms Ruzicka, from California, was killed in Baghdad after her car was caught
in the blast of a suicide bomber who attacked a convoy of security contractors
on the road to the city's airport. She was in Iraq heading, Civic, the
organisation she set up to record and document civilians killed or injured by the US
military, and to seek compensation. She carried out a similar project in
Afghanistan.
In her report, she wrote from Iraq: "In my dealings with the US military
officials here, they have shown regret and remorse for the deaths and injuries of
civilians. Systematically recording and publicly releasing civilian casualty
numbers would assist in helping the victims who survive to piece their lives
back together."
Colleagues of Ms Ruzicka at CIVIC (Campaign for Innocent Victims In Conflict
) have vowed to continue her work. April Pedersen, a friend, said: "We are all
committed to ensuring the work that Marla did is going to continue." Ms
Ruzicka, whose funeral service is to be in California on Saturday, was also
remembered on Capitol Hill where Senator Patrick Leahy, with whom Ms Ruzicka worked
to achieve almost $20m in appropriations to help victims in Afghanistan and
Iraq, paid tribute to her.
He said: "I want to... pay tribute to a remarkable young woman from Lakeport,
California. In my 31 years as a United States Senator I have met lots of
interesting and accomplished people from all over the world. We all have. Nobel
prize winners, heads of state, people who have achieved remarkable and even
heroic things in their lives. I have never met anyone like Marla Ruzicka."
Meanwhile the Pentagon maintained its position that it did not keep numbers of
civilians killed in Iraq.
'The public must know how many have died'
This is an edited extract of an article written by Marla Ruzicka a week
before her death:
In my two years in Iraq, the one question I am asked the most is: "How many
Iraqi civilians have been killed by American forces?" The American public has a
right to know how many Iraqis have lost their lives since the start of the
war and as hostilities continue.
In a news conference at Bagram air base in Afghanistan in March 2002, General
Tommy Franks said: "We don't do body counts." His words outraged the Arab
world.
During the Iraq war, as US troops pushed toward Baghdad, counting civilian
casualties was not a priority for the military. Since 1 May 2003, when President
Bush declared major combat operations over and the US military moved into
"stability operations", most units began to keep track of civilians killed at
checkpoints or during patrols by US soldiers.
Here in Baghdad, a brigadier general explained to me that it is standard
procedure for US troops to file a spot report when they shoot a non-combatant. It
is in the military's interest to release these statistics.
A number is important not only to quantify the cost of war, but as a reminder
of those whose dreams will never be realised in a free and democratic Iraq.
-------
Jump to today's TO Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t
has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t
h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow
for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often
updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match
the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links. Print
This Story E-mail This Story
| t r u t h o u t | FYI | issues | environment | labor | women | health |
voter rights | multimedia | donate | contact | subscribe |
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20050420/1c6238b4/attachment.htm
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list