[Mb-civic] On Prince Charles and Camilla

[richard haase]

neither cheeseburger
diana was a princess used for the mill of european royalty and ground up
just like it has been for centuries tragically
but ubiquitously
charles and camilla were always in love
and i say good for them
i mean if you think about it in the modern age
what the hell does a grown man have to say to a 20 year old virgin
no ones fault but doomed from the start
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cheeseburger" <maxfury at granderiver.net>
To: "mb-civic" <mb-civic at islandlists.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:54 PM
Subject: [Mb-civic] On Prince Charles and Camilla


> On Prince Charles and Camilla
>
>
>
> ======
> Two interesting and nice people in a tough situation.
> ======
>
>
>
> And Princess Diana is still sitting in her grave mulling it all over.
>
> I certainly understand various people have various viewpoints on various
> other people, perhaps even some they favor for various reasons, Prince
> Charles and Camilla being the 2 people in this current thread, however, I
> cannot "serve 2 masters".  Either I hate the one and love the other, or
visa
> versa.
>
> Either Diana was a completely intolerant sadistic raving lunatic, or her
> actual Writings and Interviews to The Press and various other people
> indicating "the unholy hell Charles put me through for 15 years" and "I'm
> afraid Charles is going to kill me to clear the way to marry Camilla" and
> "Charles is simply not fit to assume the throne", among other things, are
> all true and right on the money.
>
> If Diana was a realist and related what was actually going on, then I have
> about as much sympathy and congratulations for Charles and Camilla as I do
> for a Pope who, well, Arianna Huffington put it much better than I could
in
> her latest article that was just posted up here.
>
> On the other hand, if it actually turns out that Diana was a pathological
> liar wacko, then I wish Charles and Camilla the very best playing ding
dong
> under the covers as Diana is rotting in her grave.
>
> Either way, my opinion basically means zip as far as any Truth or Justice
> catching up to various people while they are alive in this life.  We tend
to
> judge people on the merits of what other people say about them now and
then,
> especially "royalty and celebrities" which "most of us" don't even ever
have
> an opportunity to actually meet, much less really get to know.  If Diana
> wasn't doing Thorazine when she wrote all those things about Charles, then
I
> have a tendency to have a natural built-in aversion to him.  Go figure, I
> was raised in America where many of us blurt out our feelings about other
> people based on things we think we've learned from things other people
wrote
> about them like we were sitting at a baseball game yelling slurs at an
> umpire that we haven't the slightest clue whether he is a good or bad
person
> or whether he really needs glasses or not.
>
> Is Charles really "interesting" and "nice"....?
>
> I will have to admit that he is "interesting".  Being born with a silver
> spoon in his mouth into British Royalty, and marrying a relative
"Commoner"
> who had his children, then having an affair which apparently contributed
to
> driving Diana "over the edge" of one thing or another, and then watching
her
> "die in a car crash", and then marrying the woman he was having an affair
> with all that time, is certainly "interesting".
>
> As far as "nice"...?   I don't really know the man.  I do know that if I
> handled things like he did down here in my little town, there would be
very
> little wiggle room in the gossip columns down here as to my being "Nice".
>
> Except, of course, if I was Royalty.  Then they would all be bending over
> backwards and standing in line to kiss my ring, whether I had a "nice"
bone
> in my body or not.
>
> Ah well, I can dream...        :|
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheeseburger
>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mb-civic mailing list
> Mb-civic at islandlists.com
> http://www.islandlists.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mb-civic