[Mb-civic] Message for Jack
Jack Sullivan
jack at visit.ie
Sat Apr 9 00:09:13 PDT 2005
Michael:
For my own information, and respectfully, why did my piece go unpublished? I
sent it twice.
I note that you use the word "censured"; while I inquired using the word
"censored".
It was not published on Civic so someone censored it. How does that work?
If this question is embarrassing, let it go, and I will deal with it within
my response to the Weissman piece.
Sincerely,
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Butler" <michael at michaelbutler.com>
To: "Civic" <mb-civic at islandlists.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 3:36 AM
Subject: [Mb-civic] Message for Jack
> Jack,
> Yours below, in answer, no nothing censured. I would suspect that as the
> media is saturated with the Pope most in Civic feel it is covered.
> I thought you were planning to respond to a recent article.
> Regards,
> Michael
> I don't feel I am to write about him.
>
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:10:46 +0100
> From: "Jack Sullivan" <jack at visit.ie>
> Subject: Re: [Mb-civic] Politics in Red Robes
> To: <mb-civic at islandlists.com>
> Message-ID: <004201c53c1a$e719c850$0201a8c0 at jack>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Michael:
>
> Why nothing in mb-civic about the moment that the world stopped to
consider
> the life of John Paul II. Was mine censored?
> Indeed nanorobots?
>
> Jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mb-civic mailing list
> Mb-civic at islandlists.com
> http://www.islandlists.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mb-civic
>
>
More information about the Mb-civic
mailing list