[Mb-civic] Bush Win Would Mean Dark Times

[Reeeees at aol.com]

Published on Saturday, October 30, 2004 by the Hearst Newspapers 
Bush Win Would Mean Dark Times
World Would Perceive Support For Preemptive War

by Helen Thomas 
 
The presidential election on Tuesday is one of the most crucial in American 
history. 
There are many reasons -- in foreign policy and on the domestic front -- why 
President George W. Bush should not be reelected. 
Among them is the dominance of the radical right in his advisory councils, 
who are taking the United States down the wrong road at the start of the 21st 
century. 
The road could lead to more mindless wars abroad and a widening gap between 
the rich and the poor in this country. 
There will be only one way to read the election results if Bush wins: The 
world will see his victory as an affirmation by the American people of his 
disastrous preemptive war policy, which led the United States to invade Iraq without 
provocation. 
The U.S. attack on Iraq is a clear violation of international law and has 
made us helpless to condemn others for similar acts. 
If he wins reelection, Bush may see his victory as a signal to follow the 
neo-conservative dream of a political transformation of the Middle East through 
military force. 
The president also would likely continue his new-style isolationism by giving 
short shrift to post-World War II treaties, such as those banning biological 
and chemical weapons. There is nothing to indicate Bush is willing to stop the 
gross violations of the Geneva Conventions on the humane treatment of 
prisoners of war. 
Dark reports of the shameful treatment and secret transfers of detainees 
still emanate from Iraq and the U.S. brig at the Guantanamo Bay base in Cuba. 
Despite his vehement denials, Bush may be compelled to call for another 
military draft if he persists in making war. 
He is scraping by now with his all-volunteer military, along with reservists 
and National Guard members, keeping them on duty longer than planned with a 
so-called a back-door draft. If he wins a second term, he wouldn't have to worry 
about running again and would have a free hand to undo his read-my-lips 
campaign promises. 
On the homefront, the rich will be sitting pretty again with big tax cuts 
while the budget deficit and national debt zoom sky high. 
Bush donors from the military-industrial complex are being well rewarded, 
especially Halliburton, formerly headed by Vice President Dick Cheney, which 
already has reaped no-bid contracts to the tune of billions of dollars. 
Organized labor will still be behind the eight ball under a new Bush 
administration. Workers will be pressured to accept "comp time" in place of overtime 
pay, and the lowered safety standards imposed by Bush's Labor Department will 
lead to more industrial accidents. 
Don't expect Bush to lift a finger to stem the tide of outsourcing of the 
nation's biggest companies to China, India and other points East, where they can 
find cheaper labor. 
The president is expected to keep trying to weaken public education with 
voucher programs to aid private schools, many of them religious. He is certain to 
follow through on his pet project to privatize part of the Social Security 
system with voluntary private investment accounts, driving a big hole in the 
program's trust fund. We should all hope that Congress won't go along with such a 
dangerous idea. 
Social Security was the 1936 Depression-era program to support the elderly, 
the disabled and deprived dependent children. 
Senior citizens, meantime, are staying away in droves from Bush's highly 
touted prescription drug program, which the administration publicly underpriced by 
$1 billion. Furthermore, the resident's compassionate conservative 
legislation banned importation of cheaper drugs from Canada. That is not expected to 
change in a new Bush term. 
Bush also wants to cater to corporate interests by capping damages in medical 
malpractice suits at $250,000. 
If reelected, Bush -- who has injected religion into public affairs more than 
any president has in modern times -- is expected to continue his messianic mi
ssion in the White House. He will blur even more the separation of church and 
state. 
For women and minorities who support abortion rights and affirmative action, 
there is the scary prospect that the candidate who wins Tuesday may be able to 
appoint three, perhaps even four Supreme Court justices. 
Bush undoubtedly will see his reelection as a mandate to push the country 
further to the right. And if he elected, he will be answerable to no one. 
© 2004 Hearst Newspapers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20041031/c33672df/attachment.html