[Mb-civic]     Investigative Journalist Seymour Hersh Spills the      Secrets of the Iraq Quagmire and the War on Terror

Michael Butler michael at michaelbutler.com
Wed Oct 13 21:09:26 PDT 2004


    Go to Original 

    Investigative Journalist Seymour Hersh Spills the
    Secrets of the Iraq Quagmire and the War on Terror
    By Bonnie Azab Powell
    U.C. Berkeley News

     Monday 11 October 2004

  


KQED host Michael Krasny was supposed to be interviewing Seymour Hersh
(pictured), but the veteran journalist rarely let Krasny get a word in.
(Photo: Bart Nagel)
     Berkeley - The Iraq war is not winnable, a secret U.S. military unit
has been "disappearing" people since December 2001, and America has no idea
how irreparably its torture of Iraqis at Abu Ghraib prison has damaged its
image in the Middle East. These were just a few of the grim pronouncements
made by Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter Seymour "Sy" Hersh to
KQED host Michael Krasny before a Berkeley audience on Friday night (Oct.
8).

     The past two years will "go down as one of the classic sort of
failures" in history, said the man who has been called the "greatest
muckraker of all time" and (paradoxically) the "enfant terrible of
journalism for more than 30 years." While Hersh blamed the White House and
the Pentagon for the Iraq quagmire and America's besmirched world image, he
was stymied by how it all happened. "How could eight or nine
neoconservatives come and take charge of this government?" he asked. "They
overran the bureaucracy, they overran the Congress, they overran the press,
and they overran the military! So you say to yourself, How fragile is this
democracy?"

     From My Lai to Abu Ghraib

    That fragility clearly unnerves him. Hersh summarizes his mission as "to
hold the people in public office to the highest possible standard of decency
and of honesty...to tolerate anything less, even in the name of national
security, is wrong." He tries his best. More than any other U.S. journalist
alive today, he embodies the statement that "a patriot must always be ready
to defend his country against his government," a belief defined by the
conservationist Edward Abbey.

     His country has not always thanked him for it - neocon Pentagon adviser
Richard Perle has called Hersh "the closest thing we have to a terrorist,"
while his 1998 book on John F. Kennedy's administration, "The Dark Side of
Camelot," cost him many friends on the left. But Hersh's reputation remains
more bulletproof than most. The author of eight books, he first received
worldwide recognition (and the Pulitzer) in 1969 for exposing the My Lai
massacre and its cover-up during the Vietnam War. 1982's "The Price of
Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House," painted Henry Kissinger as a war
criminal and won Hersh the National Book Critics Circle Award and the Los
Angeles Times book prize in biography.

     Most recently, as a staff writer for the New Yorker, Hersh has
relentlessly ferreted out the behind-the-scenes deals, trickery, and
blunders associated with the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Back in
May 2003, he was the first American reporter to state unequivocally that we
would not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. (A mea culpa from a
Slate journalist who doubted Hersh on WMDs also inadvertently confirms his
prescient track record.) And in April of this year, he broke the story of
how U.S. soldiers had digitally documented their torture and sexual
humiliation of Iraqis at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The
several articles he wrote for the New Yorker about Abu Ghraib have been
updated and edited into his latest book, "Chain of Command: The Road from
9/11 to Abu Ghraib."

     "Bush Scares the Hell Out of Me"

 


Hersh was working the phone with sources up until the minute the
presidential debate began, which he watched with a crowd in North Gate Hall.
(Photo: Bart Nagel)
     Hersh came to Berkeley at the invitation of UC Berkeley's Graduate
School of Journalism and the California First Amendment Coalition. His
appearance in the packed ballroom of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Student
Union was the fitting end to a week of high-profile events in honor of the
40th anniversary of the Free Speech Movement.

     The Hersh event began only minutes after the second debate between
President George W. Bush and John Kerry concluded. Krasny naturally asked
Hersh - who had watched the debate at North Gate Hall stone-faced in the
middle of a rowdy crowd - what he thought of the match.

     "It doesn't matter that Bush scares the hell out of me," Hersh
answered. "What matters is that he scares the hell out of a lot of very
important people in Washington who can't speak out, in the military, in the
intelligence community. They know in ways that none of us know, the
incredible gap between what is and what [Bush] thinks."

     With that, he was off and running. One could safely say that for the
next hour, Hersh proceeded to scare the hell out of most of the audience by
detailing the gaps between what they knew and what he hears is actually
going on in Iraq.

     While his writing is dense but digestible, in person Hersh speaks with
the rambling urgency of a street-corner doomsayer, leaping from point to
point and anecdote to anecdote and frequently failing to finish his clauses,
let alone his sentences. His train of thought can be difficult to catch a
ride on. This evening, it was a challenge for Krasny to slow him down long
enough to get a word or question in edgewise. For example, here's a slice of
raw Hersh on the current situation in Iraq:
 I've been doing an alternate history of the war, from inside, because
people, right after 9/11, because people inside - and there are a lot of
good people inside - are scared, as scared as anybody watching this tonight
I think should be, because [Bush], if he's re-elected, has only one thing to
do, he's going to bomb the hell out of that place. He's been bombing the
hell of that place - and here's what really irritates me again, about the
press - since he set up this Potemkin Village government with Allawi on June
28 - the bombing, the daily bombing rates inside Iraq, have gone up
exponentially. There's no public accounting of how many missions are flown,
how much ordinance is dropped, we have no accounting and no demand to know.
The only sense you get is we're basically in a full-scale air war against
invisible people that we can't find, that we have no intelligence about, so
we bomb what we can see.

     And yet - despite the more than 1,000 deaths of U.S. soldiers and the
horrific number of Iraqi casualties - Bush continues to believe we are doing
the right thing, according to Hersh. "He thinks he's wearing the white hat,"
he said, adding that is what makes this administration different from
previous ones whose hypocrisy Hersh has exposed. Bush and the neocons "are
not hypocrites."

     Enter the Utopians

    "I think it's real simple to say [Bush] is a liar. But that would also
suggest there was a reality that he understood," explained Hersh. "I'm
serious. It is funny in sort of a sick, black humor sort of way, but the
real serious problem is, he believes what he's doing." In effect, Bush, Dick
Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and the other neocons are "idealists, you can call
them utopians." As Hersh understands them, they really believe that the
solution to global terrorism began with invading Baghdad and will end only
with the transformation of the last unfriendly government in the Middle East
into a democracy.

     "No amount of body bags is going to dissuade [Bush]," said Hersh,
despite the fact that Hersh's sources say the war in Iraq is "not winnable.
It's over." As for Kerry's war plans, Hersh said he wished he could tell him
to stop talking as if the senator's plan for Iraq could somehow still eke
out a victory there. "This is a disaster that's been going on. It's a civil
war, the insurgency. There is no 'win' anymore in this war," he argued. "As
somebody said, 'We're playing chess, they're playing Go.'"

     Later, Hersh shared something he had yet to write about. Sources were
suggesting that the many acts of domestic terrorism in Iraq that U.S.
officials have been attributing to suspected Al Qaeda operative Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi are in fact a smokescreen set up by the insurgents. "They decided
to wage war against their own population," he said. "It's a huge step, with
enormous consequences....The insurgency has simply deflected what they're
doing onto this man. And we fell for it."

     What is worse, he said impatiently, was that because U.S. forces had
"privatized" so many of Iraq's institutions, it had decimated the job market
in the country. "This is why Bush can talk about 100,000 people wanting to
go work in the police or in the army. It's because there's nothing else for
them to do. They're willing to stand in line to get bombed because they want
to take care of their family," he said.

     Hersh has been accused many times of sympathizing with "the enemy," and
told that his publicizing of incidents like the My Lai massacre and the Abu
Ghraib torture only fan the flames of anti-American sentiment around the
world. He related that he's been asked if he feels guilty about the
beheadings of two Americans who were wearing uniforms like those worn at Abu
Ghraib. "As if the Iraqis needed me to tell them what's going on in that
prison!" he responded. He also repeated a question often posed to him: "Was
it immoral to go in ... [T]he idea that Saddam was a torturer and a killer,
doesn't that lend a patina of morality to going after him?" The answer to
that one, he said unsmilingly, "is of course, Saddam tortured and killed his
people. And now we're doing it."

  


'We operate on guilt, [Muslims] operate on shameŠThe idea of photographing
an Arab man naked and having him simulate homosexual activity, and having an
American GI woman in the photographs, is the end of society in their eyes.'
-Seymour Hersh 
(Photo: Bart Nagel)
     In addition to adding more details to the woeful chronology of the Abu
Ghraib scandal, in which the military stopped the abuse only after Hersh's
story brought it crashing down onto front pages around the world - four
months after it was first reported to the Department of Defense - Hersh
speculated on why those dehumanizing techniques had been used. He was sure
that they were not, as some have claimed, the "stress outlet" or other
spontaneous recreational ideas of young soldiers from West Virginia.
Instead, he said, they were the outgrowth of a massive manhunt for
information, any information, about first Al Qaida, the Taliban, and then
the Iraqi insurgency:
 My government has a secret unit that since December of 2001 has been
disappearing people just like the Brazilians and the Argentineans did.
Rumsfeld decided after 9/11 that he could not wait. The president signed a
secret document...There's a team of people, they fly in unmarked planes,
they fly in Gulfstreams, they have their own choppers, they don't carry
American passports, and they just grab people. And maybe in the beginning I
can understand there was some rationale. Right after 9/11 we were
frightened, we didn't know what to do ... The original idea behind the
sexually humiliating photos taken at Abu Ghraib, Hersh said he had heard,
was to use them as blackmail so that the newly released prisoners - many of
whom were ordinary Iraqi thieves or even civilian bystanders rounded up in
dragnets - would act as informants. "We operate on guilt, [Muslims] operate
on shame," Hersh explained. "The idea of photographing an Arab man naked and
having him simulate homosexual activity, and having an American GI woman in
the photographs, is the end of society in their eyes."

     And the fact that Americans had perpetrated such acts - and refused to
take responsibility for it - ended America's role as any kind of moral
leader in the eyes of not just the Middle East, but the world, Hersh railed.
He talked about an Israeli, a longtime veteran of the troubles between his
country and the Palestinians, who had emailed him to say, in essence, "We've
been killing them for 40 or 50 years, and they've been killing us for 40 or
50 years, but we know that somewhere down the line we're going to have to
live with those SOBs...If we had treated our Arabs the way you treated them
in Abu Ghraib, the sexual stuff, the photographs, we couldn't live with
them. You guys do not begin to understand what you've done, where you have
put yourself in the Arab world."

     "They Just Shot Them One by One"

    There was more - rumors of atrocities around Iraq that to Hersh brought
back memories of My Lai. In the evening's most emotional moment, Hersh
talked about a call he had gotten from a first lieutenant in charge of a
unit stationed halfway between Baghdad and the Syrian border. His group was
bivouacking outside of town in an agricultural area, and had hired 30 or so
Iraqis to guard a local granary. A few weeks passed. They got to know the
men they hired, and to like them. Then orders came down from Baghdad that
the village would be "cleared." Another platoon from the soldier's company
came and executed the Iraqi granary guards. All of them.

     "He said they just shot them one by one. And his people, and he, and
the villagers of course, went nuts," Hersh said quietly. "He was hysterical,
totally hysterical. He went to the company captain, who said, 'No, you don't
understand, that's a kill. We got 36 insurgents. Don't you read those
stories when the Americans say we had a combat maneuver and 15 insurgents
were killed?'

     "It's shades of Vietnam again, folks: body counts," Hersh continued.
"You know what I told him? I said, 'Fella, you blamed the captain, he knows
that you think he committed murder, your troops know that their fellow
soldiers committed murder. Shut up. Complete your tour. Just shut up! You're
going to get a bullet in the back.' And that's where we are in this war."

     The story seemed to leave Hersh sincerely, deeply saddened. While his
critics may call him a "muckraker" and unpatriotic, on Friday night it was
obvious that Hersh takes the crumbling of America's image, very, very
personally.

     "My parents were immigrants," Hersh said. "They came here because
America meant something...the Statue of Liberty and all that stuff, because
America always was this bastion of morality and integrity and a place for a
fresh start. And it's right in front of us, not hidden, that they've taken
this away from us."

  

  -------

   Jump to TO Features for Thursday October 14, 2004   


 © Copyright 2004 by TruthOut.org




More information about the Mb-civic mailing list