[Mb-civic] The Scary Little Man

[Michael Butler]

Seethe Scary Little Man
    By William Rivers Pitt
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

     Friday 08 October 2004
 "He had a feeling that the answer was quite different and that he ought to
know it, but he could not think of it. He began to get frightened, and that
is bad for thinking."

- J.R.R. Tolkien

    George W. Bush, still smarting from his embarrassing performance in the
Florida debate, decided on Friday night in St. Louis that volume was a good
substitute for strength, that yelling would be mistaken for gravitas. The
result was an ugly, disturbing, genuinely frightening show.

      In my report on the first debate, I described Bush as, "Shrill.
Defensive. Muddled. Angry, very angry. Repetitive. Uninformed. Outmatched.
Unprepared. Hesitant." As bad as that display was, it honestly paled in
comparison to the frenzied hectoring Bush sprayed at 140 Missouri citizens
who had the ill fortune of watching the man come unglued before their eyes.

     John Kerry, by comparison, was every inch the controlled prosecutor
pressing his case to the jury. It was, perhaps, that calm delineation of
Bush's myriad errors which caused the Republican candidate to blow his
stack. Exactly 30 minutes into the debate, Bush became so agitated by
Kerry's description of the "back-door draft," which is literally bleeding
the life out of our National Guard and Reserve forces, that he lunged out of
his chair and shrieked over moderator Charles Gibson, who was trying to
maintain some semblance of decorum.

     "You tell Tony Blair we're going alone," Bush roared. "Tell Tony Blair
we're going alone!" The disturbed murmur from the crowd was audible. Bush,
simply, frightened them.

     More unsettling than Bush's demonstrable agitation was his almost
uncanny disconnect from reality.

      The voluminous report released by Charles Duelfer and the Iraq Survey
Group, compiled by 1,625 U.N. and U.S. weapons inspectors after two years of
searching some 1,700 sites in Iraq at a cost of more than $1 billion, stated
flatly that no weapons of mass destruction exist in that nation, that no
weapons of mass destruction have existed in that nation for years, and that
any capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction within that nation has
been crumbling for the same amount of years.

     "My opponent said that America must pass a global test before we used
force to protect ourselves," said Bush during the Iraq phase of the debate.
"That's the kind of mindset that says sanctions were working. That's the
kind of mindset that said, 'Let's keep it at the United Nations and hope
things go well.' Saddam Hussein was a threat because he could have given
weapons of mass destruction to terrorist enemies. Sanctions were not
working."

     What? First of all, the Duelfer Report proves beyond any question that
sanctions had worked incredibly well. The stuff wasn't there, because Scott
Ritter and the UNSCOM inspectors destroyed it all during the 1990s, along
with any and all equipment and facilities to make it. The stuff wasn't there
because the sanctions put into place against Hussein prevented him from
getting any material to develop weapons. The stuff wasn't there because
Hussein stopped making it years ago, because the sanctions were breaking his
back. The sanctions worked.

     When Bush made the statement about Hussein giving weapons of mass
destruction to "terrorist enemies," the needle edged over from 'Dumb' to
'Deranged.' How many different ways must one say "The stuff wasn't there"
before George picks up the clue phone? How does someone give away something
he doesn't have?

     Bush continued in this appalling vein when he said, "He keeps talking
about, 'Let the inspectors do their job.' It's naive and dangerous to say
that. That's what the Duelfer report showed." Welcome to Bush World, where
everything is upside down and two plus two equals a bag of hammers. It is
naive and dangerous to point out that the inspectors got the job done in the
1990s, that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction whatsoever? No, George.
It is simply the truth.

      The mental disconnect reared its shouting head repeatedly throughout
the evening. Bush somehow lost track of where he was at one point and called
his opponent, "Senator Kennedy." He told one questioner that he would
control the deficit by stopping Congress from spending, only a few minutes
after defending the fact that he had never, not once, vetoed a spending bill
from Congress.

     He made an accountant crack about "Battling green eyeshades," a
statement that immediately became a first-ballot nominee for the Gibberish
Hall of Fame. When asked what kind of Supreme Court Justice he would
nominate if given an opportunity, he wandered off along a free-association
rant about Dred Scott. Clearly, this President will make sure to nominate
people to the bench who are opposed to chattel slavery.

     Perhaps the most telling moment came when questioner Linda Grabel asked
Bush, "Please give three instances in which you came to realize you had made
a wrong decision, and what you did to correct it."

     As with his April prime time press conference, in which he was asked a
very similar question, Bush absolutely refused to admit to any errors in
judgment, beyond a cryptic quip about mistakes in personnel appointments
which he would not elaborate upon. He opened himself up to the judgment of
history, a sad straddle given the simple fact that no President can avoid
such a judgment. That was all he was willing to offer. Ms. Grabel did not
hear about three mistakes. She did not even hear about one.

     Bush was every inch the angry man on Friday night, which is dangerous
enough. But to witness anger combined with belligerent ignorance, with a
willful denial of basic facts, to witness a man utterly incapable of
admitting to any mistakes while his clear errors in judgment are costing his
country in blood, to see that combination roiling within the man who is in
charge of the most awesome military arsenal in the history of the planet, is
more than dangerous.

     It is flatly terrifying.

  

  -------

   Jump to TO Features for Sunday October 10, 2004   


 © Copyright 2004 by TruthOut.org