[Mb-civic] We Are Not 'A Nation In Danger'

[ean at sbcglobal.net]

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/04/opinion/meyer/printable634111.s
html

We Are Not 'A Nation In Danger'
WASHINGTON, August 5, 2004


This Against the Grain commentary was written by CBSNews.com's Dick 
Meyer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
"We are a nation in danger." 

- President George W. Bush,
August 2, 2004 


I don’t buy it. 

I think America in 2004 is about as far removed from fundamental danger as 
any nation in history has ever been. We may be scared, but we are, in fact, 
safe. Safe, at least, by any reasonable historic measure. 

No other country on earth has military might even close to ours. Has such a 
global monopoly on armed power ever existed? Has any nation had less to 
fear from its neighbors and foreign armies? 

Modern America does know real danger. The nuclear duel of the Cold War 
was real danger. America is safer than it was when the Soviet Union existed. 
The threat of nuclear proliferation, of a nuclear attack from a small state or 
terrorists, existed then, too. The country is probably better prepared to 
prevent that now. 

We are safer from plague, pestilence, famine and weather than any of our 
ancestors ever were. 

We have one of the most stable governments in human history. There is no 
risk of a dictator, a Gestapo or a civil war. 

I'm quite certain that I've never been accused of being an optimist. But even I 
can't accept the dark, frightened dictate the president issued, ironically, from 
the Rose Garden. 

America does have enemies - crazy, sadistic, tenacious, growing and wily 
enemies. America is an open and ethnically diverse society with vast borders, 
huge tourism and immigration. 

So the country is of course vulnerable to terrorism. After 9/11, Americans feel 
that acutely and perhaps that is sad. But no one in government 
underestimates the country's vulnerability or the power of the unconventional 
enemy. 

This does not, however, add up to a nation in danger. It adds up to 
something that sounds too callous for politicians to say out loud. America is 
vulnerable to the tragedy and trauma of a terrorists attacks. There is a much 
more remote danger of an act of terror with a nuclear device that could 
eclipse 9/11. But there is no danger of the equivalent of war on our soil, of 
mass loss of life, of a crippled economy, disrupted civilian life and 
destabilized government. 

Israel is in danger. Palestinians are in danger. Iraq is in danger. Sudan is in 
danger. Colombia is in danger. America is not in danger. 

And America is not at war. 

What happened in Afghanistan and Iraq was war. We should have stuck to 
that old-fashioned use of the word war. The battle now and ahead with the 
evildoers is not likely to be helped by calling it war any longer. 

Perhaps it was necessary to use the rhetoric of war after 9/11 to marshal an 
adequate and swift response to the newly real threat. Perhaps. We’ve had 
wars on crime, a war on drugs and even a war on poverty. Why not a war on 
terror? There is no intrinsic reason why not. 

But war, and even war rhetoric, can rationalize unwise and uncharacteristic 
choices at home – restricted civil liberties, plundered treasury, over-reaching 
bureaucracy, fear-mongering, and misplaced secrecy. Both the 
administration and the opposition party have bungled that balance; the 
glaring example of that is the dishonest case that was sold and bought for 
invading Iraq. Both sides have squandered credibility. 

"War" is a word that ends arguments. So is "danger." The president has tried 
to sell a lot of policy by saying it was necessary because we are at war and in 
danger and so have the Democrats. 

We don’t need to declare ourselves "a nation in danger" or "a nation at war" 
to carefully reform the intelligence bureaucracy, to respond to discovered 
plots and threats, to catch terrorists or to get other nations to help our cause. 

We don’t need to be a nation of crybabies or a nation that cries wolf. 


Dick Meyer, a veteran political and investigative producer for CBS News, is 
the Editorial Director of CBSNews.com, based in Washington. 


By Dick Meyer
©MMIV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action network email list, option C (up 
to 1 email/day).  To be removed, or to switch options (option A - 1x/week, 
option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option D - up to 3x/day) please reply 
and let us know!  If someone forwarded you this email and you want to be on 
our list, send an email to ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which option you'd 
like.


Action is the antidote to despair.  ----Joan Baez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20040807/915a9c4b/attachment.html